Mayfair
Community Development District June 25, 2026

Seat 2: Gregory Pettibon – (C.)		
Seat 1: Jared Shaver – (V.C.)		
Seat 4: Bojana Brown – (A.S.)		
Seat 5: Gerardo L. Aguirre – (A.S.)		
Seat 3: Haley Mall – (A.S.)		

Mayfair
Community Development District
Special Meeting Agenda
Thursday		The Offices of Construction Engineering Group June 25, 2026	2651 W. Eau Gallie Blvd. Suite A, Melbourne, Florida 32935 10:00 a.m.			 Join the meeting now
Meeting ID: 242 101 597 726 702 and Passcode: uW67zq25
1 872-240-4685 and Phone Conference ID: 254 930 935#

Roll Call
Approval of the Minutes of the May 7, 2026 Meetings – Page 3

Public Hearing to Consider the Imposition of Special Assessments
Motion to Open the Public Hearing

Public Comment and Discussion

Acceptance of Engineers Report – Page 9

Acceptance of Master Assessment Methodology – Page 56

Approving the Project and Declaring Special Assessments will Fund the Project

Equalization of Assessments

Adoption of Resolution #2026-12 Authorizing Projects, Levying Special Assessments, and Confirming Intention to Issue Bonds – Page 75

Motion to Close the Public Hearing

Ratification of First Amended Notice of Establishment – Page 81

Staff Reports
Attorney – Memorandum – 2026 Legislative Update – Page 89

Engineer

Manager

Financial Reports
Acceptance of Check Register – Page 95

Acceptance of Unaudited Financials – Page 97

Supervisors Requests and Audience Comments

Adjournment

Meetings are open to the public and may be continued to a time, date and place certain. For more information regarding this CDD please visit the website: http://www.mayfaircdd.com

MINUTES OF MEETING MAYFAIR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Mayfair Community Development District was held on Thursday, May 7, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at 2651 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite A, Melbourne, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Jared Shaver	Vice Chairman
Bojana Brown	Assistant Secretary
Haley Mall	Assistant Secretary

Also present were:

Andressa Hinz Philippi	District Manager
Rich Hans	Governmental Management Services (by phone)
Ginger Wald	District Counsel (by phone)
Jake Wise	District Engineer

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Ms. Hinz Philippi called the meeting to order and called roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of the Minutes of the
January 8, 2026 Meeting
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented the minutes from the January 8, 2026 meeting, and asked for any comments or corrections. Upon hearing none, he asked for a motion to approve the minutes.

On MOTION by Mr. Shaver seconded by Ms. Mall with all in favor, the Minutes of the January 8, 2026 Meeting were approved.

May 7, 2026	Mayfair CDD

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Resolution
#2026-07  Amending  Resolution
#2026-03 & #2026-04
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented resolution #2026-07 amending resolution #2026-03 & #2026-04 stating this item was included in the agenda on page 14. She then gave a brief explanation of the item and asked for any questions or comments. Upon hearing none, she asked for a motion to adopt the resolution.

On MOTION by Mr. Shaver seconded by Ms. Mall with all in favor, Resolution #2026-07 amending Resolution #2026-03 & #2026-04 was approved.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	of	Financing	Matters
Related to Series 2025 Bond
Consideration of Supplemental Engineers Report
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented item No. 4A, consideration of supplemental engineers report and asked Mr. Wise to give a brief overview of the report.
Mr. Wise stated there were no new updates since the last meeting relating the engineers report and asked if there were any questions or comments.
Ms. Wald stated revisions were made to the engineers report from the last meeting and asked Mr. Wise if those revisions were included in the March 5, 2026 report as to the townhomes being added and the phase 5 construction improvement amounts for the townhomes that were listed on page 8 and 9 of the report.
Mr. Wise confirmed that was correct stating on page 3 the townhomes were added, and pages 8 and 9 were also updated.
Ms. Hinz Philippi then asked for a motion to accept the updated engineers report with the indicated changes as presented by Mr. Wise.

On MOTION by Ms. Brown seconded by Ms. Hall with all in favor, accepting the updated Engineers Report dated March 5, 2026 was approved.

Consideration of Master Assessment Methodology
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented item No. 5B, consideration of master assessment methodology included in the agenda and asked Mr. Hans to give a brief overview of the report.

May 7, 2026	Mayfair CDD

Mr. Hans then gave a brief summary relating to the information within tables 1 through 7 included in the report starting on page 70.
Ms. Hinz Philippi then asked for a motion to accept the master assessment methodology as presented.

On MOTION by Mr. Shaver seconded by Ms. Brown with all in favor, accepting the Master Assessment Methodology was approved.

Consideration of Resolution #2026-08 Declaring Special Assessments
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented resolution #2026-08, declaring Special Assessments and gave a brief explanation of the item. She then asked for any questions or comments and upon hearing none, asked for a motion to adopt the resolution.
Ms. Wald also make a few additional comments relating to this item.

On MOTION by Mr. Shaver seconded by Ms. Mall with all in favor, Resolution #2026-08 Declaring Special Assessments was approved.

Consideration of Resolution #2026-09 Calling for a Public Hearing to Impose Special Assessments
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented resolution #2026-09 calling for a public hearing to impose Special Assessments stating this item was included on page 89 of the agenda.
Ms. Wald then stated the Board would need to pick a date for the public hearing at least 30 days out from today for advertising purposes and the landowners notification to proceed forward with the validation and issuance of the bonds.
(At this point a brief discussion was held among the Board members, Ms. Wald and Ms. Hinz Philippi relating to this item)(Ms. Hinz Philippi commented the next scheduled Board meeting would be June 4th but that would not meeting the 30 day requirement)(The Board agreed to schedule a Special Board Meeting on June 25th for the public hearing)

Ms. Hinz Philippi then asked for a motion to adopt resolution #2026-09 setting a special meeting on June 25, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. at the current location, 2651 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite A, Melbourne, Florida.

May 7, 2026	Mayfair CDD

On MOTION by Ms. Mall seconded by Ms. Brown with all in favor, Resolution #2026-09 calling for a Public Hearing to Impose Special Assessments on June 25, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. at 2651 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite A, Melbourne, Florida was approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of:
Resolution #2026-10 Authorizing Implementation of Capital Improvement Plan
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented the resolution #2026-10 authorizing implementation of capital improvement plan stating this item was included in the agenda on page 91 and asked Ms. Wald to give a brief summary of the resolution.
Ms. Wald stated this resolution was prepared at the request of the chairman, Mr. Pettibon, to be placed on the agenda to give the chairman or the vice chairman the authority to execute all documents of the capital improvement plan that was approved via the engineers report. She then made a few additional comments relating to the resolution and asked for any questions or comments. Upon hearing none, she asked for a motion to adopt the resolution.

On MOTION by Ms. Brown seconded by Mr. Shaver with all in favor, Resolution #2026-10 authorizing implementation of Capital Improvement Plan subject to review and approval of District Engineer, District Manager and District Counsel was approved.

Resolution #2026-11 Approving the Proposed Fiscal Year 2027 Budget and Setting the Public Hearing
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented item No. 5A, consideration of resolution #2026-11 approving the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget and setting the public hearing. She then gave a brief overview of the proposed budget stating she had sent the budget to the chairman to review and he proposed keeping the assessment the same with no increase and add the developer contribution.
(At this point a brief discussion was held among the Board members and Ms. Hinz Philippi relating to the proposed budget)

Ms. Hinz Philippi then stated pursuant to the Statute, the public hearing date needed to be set at least 60 days out from today’s meeting which would be the August 6th meeting.

May 7, 2026	Mayfair CDD

She then asked for any comments or questions, and upon hearing none, asked for a motion to adopt the resolution scheduling the public hearing on August 6, 2026 at the same time and location.

On MOTION by Mr. Shaver seconded by Ms. Mall with all in favor, Resolution #2026-11 approving the proposed Fiscal Year 2027 Budget and setting the Public Hearing on August 6, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. at 2651 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite A, Melbourne Florida was approved.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Ratification	of	Consent	and
Joinder of Mayfair Community Development District
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented the ratification of consent and joinder of Mayfair CDD stating this item was included in the agenda on page 100.
Ms. Wald stated this item was already taken care of at the last meeting, and the execution of the joinder was approved and ratified so it didn’t need to be on the agenda again.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Attorney – Consideration of Request for Adjustment to District Counsel Fee Structure
Ms. Wald gave a brief explanation relating to the request for adjustment to District Counsel fee structure stating the current fee structure had been in place since 2007 and it was necessary for them to adjust their hourly rate effective October 1, 2026. She then asked for a motion to approve the request for adjustment to District counsel fee structure.

On MOTION by Ms. Brown seconded by Mr. Shaver with all in favor, accepting the request for adjustment to District Counsel fee structure effective October 1, 2026 was approved.

Engineer
There not being any, the next item followed.

May 7, 2026	Mayfair CDD

Manager
There not being any, the next item followed.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Financial Reports
Acceptance of Check Register
Acceptance of Unaudited Financials
Ms. Hinz Philippi presented the check register and the unaudited financials and asked for any comments or questions. Upon not hearing any, he asked for a motion to accept the financial reports.

On MOTION by Mr. Shaver seconded by Ms. Mall with all in favor, the Check Register and the Unaudited Financials were approved.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisors	Requests	and
Audience Comments
Ms. Hinz Philippi asked for any Supervisor’s requests or audience comments at this time stating there was no audience in attendance for any comments.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment
Ms. Hinz Philippi asked for a motion to adjourn the meeting.

On MOTION by Ms. Mall seconded by Mr. Shaver with all in favor, the Meeting was adjourned.

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairman / Vice Chairman

MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ENGINEERING REPORT

PREPARED FOR:
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

PREPARED BY:

2651 W. Eau Gallie Blvd. Melbourne, FL 32935
Board of Professional Engineering License No. 0008097

March 5, 2026

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OVERVIEW

PURPOSE AND SCOPE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
LAND USE
REPORT MODIFICATION

INFRASTRUCTURE BENEFITS

PROPOSED PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE

OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE AUTHORITY

SUMMARY OF COSTS

PERMITTING AND GOVERNMENTAL ACTION

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

pg. 1

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

OVERVIEW

This Engineering Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by Construction Engineering Group, LLC as authorized by the Mayfair Community Development District (hereinafter referred to as “CDD” or “District”), a local unit of special purpose government, established by virtue of Ordinance No. 2007-20 of the City of Melbourne, in Brevard County Florida.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this Report is to present the scope, cost and benefit of the proposed improvements (“Public Infrastructure Improvements”) needed to serve the Mayfair development (herein as the “Development”), which will include lands located within the boundaries of the CDD. Currently, the Public Infrastructure Improvements are in various stages of final design and permitting. The Development will be constructed in five phases. See page 8 for a cost estimate for each phase. Currently, Phase I is under construction. This Report discusses the overall proposed Public Infrastructure Improvements, along with the District boundary, infrastructure benefits and costs. All improvements that will be financed by the District will be on land owned by the District or subject to a permanent easement dedicated to the District or other units of local government

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Overall Mayfair Development is approximately +/- 315 acres of previously densely wooded area within the City of Melbourne in Brevard County, Florida. It is located in Section 15, Township 28 South, Range 37 East, and bordered by a few public rights-of-way; east of Babcock Street, west of Lipscomb Street, north of Pirate Lane, and located south of Florida Avenue. A majority of the site clearing has occurred with Phase I earthwork remaining largely undeveloped.

The Public Infrastructure Improvements needed for the overall Development include, but are not limited to water mains, and water distribution facilities, gravity mains and sanitary sewer facilities, local roads, stormwater management systems and other public right-of-way Improvements.

DISTRICT BOUNDARY/COMPOSITION OF DISTRICT LAND

The District originally contained approximately 256.71 acres of land of varying intended uses, densely wooded, with grade elevations ranging from 19’ to 24’ NAVD. The District has filed a petition with the City of Melbourne to remove portions of land from the CDD boundaries by
94.33 acres, which upon contraction of the boundaries a total 162.38 acres will remain. Subsequently, a portion of Tract B totaling 8.24 acres was removed from the District boundary reducing the total to 154.14 acres. Table 1 below denotes the original lands within the District boundary and their original intended use.

pg. 2

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

TABLE 1 - ORIGINAL DISTRICT LAND	
Tract
No.	Use	Owner	Acreage	
A	Single- Family Residential, Stormwater & Parks	KL LB Buy 2, LLC	125.01	
Portion
of B	Residential, Mixed-Use, Stormwater & Parks	Southern Homes of Melbourne II, LLC	131.70	
Total			256.71	

Table 2A below is reflective of the lands within the District boundary after the contraction of the District boundaries.

TABLE 2A - NEW DISTRICT LAND	
Tract	Use	Owner	Acreage	
A	Single-Family Residential, Stormwater & Parks	KL LB Buy 2, LLC	125.01	
Portion
of B	Residential, Stormwater & Parks	Southern Homes of Melbourne II, LLC	29.13	
Total			154.14	

Table 2B below is reflective of the proposed lot summary within the District boundaries
TABLE 2B - PROPOSED LOT SUMMARY	
Lot Type	Number of Lots	
Single-Family	536	
Townhomes	123	

LAND USE

Lands within the District have a few varying Future Land Uses, per the City of Melbourne’s Future Land Use Map, which were established in 2010 by the Department of Community Affairs’ adoption of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Revision. These categories include Mixed-Use, a land use category intended to provide a mixture of residential, commercial, recreational, and institutional uses generally along major transportation corridors in the City, general commercial, a land use category to accommodate general retail sales and service, professional and business offices, personal services and limited medium to high density residential, and Medium Density Residential, a land use category to accommodate single and multiple-family structure types and mobile home parks, planned unit development (PUD) a low density residential land use intended for a single family subdivision with amenities.

pg. 3

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

REPORT MODIFICATIONS

As the course of development continues, it may be necessary to modify this Report if the scope of the intended Public Infrastructure Improvements for the District changes. If no changes occur to this scope, then no such deviations to this Report will be needed.

If the District decides to undertake additional Public Infrastructure Improvements related to the individual residential subdivisions, those improvements will need to be mutually agreed upon with the CDD and developer, and then added to a supplemental engineering report.

INFRASTRUCTURE BENEFITS

The proposed improvements discussed in this Report are intended to be constructed to service the future residential areas, specifically the single-family residential neighborhoods within the boundaries of the District, and miscellaneous other site improvements. The property is currently in Phase I construction, with the exception of the abandoned building abutting Babcock Street (once in operation as the SH Communities model center) and remains unused to date.

PROPOSED PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE

The project will consist of the following proposed Public Infrastructure Improvements:
Water Distribution System
Sanitary Sewer System
Stormwater System
Reclaimed Water System
Roadway Improvements
Public Right-of-Way Improvements
Entry Features
Public Parks
Miscellaneous Items, such as, but not limited to, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Testing, Inspections, Geotechnical Engineering, Permitting and Fees, Design, Initial Planning, Insurance, Appraisals, Legal, Administrative and Project Management.

The District has the authority and power to acquire, finance , fund, and construct any of the above systems noted as Public Infrastructure Improvements. Specifics regarding ownership and maintenance of the systems will be discussed further in the later section of this report, Ownership and Maintenance Authority. Any Public Infrastructure Improvements not funded by the CDD, along with any Private Infrastructure Improvements included in the overall project, will be the responsibility of the developer(s) to fund and construct.

pg. 4

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

Details regarding the proposed Public Infrastructure Improvements are noted:

Water Distribution System

The City of Melbourne Utilities Department has potable water service capacity to service the Development, to be used for potable use and fire protection. The District will acquire or construct the master water distribution system and then transfer ownership at certification of site work to the City of Melbourne through a Bill of Sale. The potable water system will include distribution mains throughout the development and then stubs to each of the single-family neighborhoods. The potable water system internal to the neighborhoods is not included within the scope of the District’s responsibility to fund and/or construct. Please refer to Section IV for ownership and maintenance responsibilities after construction certification. Phase I water system is permitted.

Sanitary Sewer System

The City of Melbourne Utilities Department has sanitary sewer service capacity to service the Development, to be used for public use. The District will acquire or construct the master sanitary sewer system and then transfer ownership at certification of site work to the City of Melbourne through a Bill of Sale. The sanitary sewer system will include a mix of gravity sewer, lift station & a force main. The single-family neighborhoods will be serviced by gravity sewer which will flow to a lift station, which will in turn tie-into the master City sewer system. This internal system will remain funded by the developer, but the master system including the lift station and force main will be funded and constructed by the District. The sewer system internal to the neighborhoods is not included within the scope of the District’s responsibility to fund and/or construct. The overall sanitary sewer design is complete but has not received final City or FDEP approval. Please refer to Section IV for ownership and maintenance responsibilities after construction certification. Phase I gravity collection, life station and force main are permitted.

Stormwater System

The District will acquire or construct the entire stormwater management system and will remain the ownership and maintenance entity after construction is complete. This includes the stormwater system servicing the spine road to the west, as well as internal to the single-family neighborhoods. The District will be the legal owner and maintenance entity for all ponds and stormwater infrastructure. Ponds will be interconnected through a series of storm pipes and the ultimate outfall is anticipated to the existing on-site canal. The spine road and internal neighborhood roads will be crowned, and curb inlets placed at designated low points along the local roads. Intersections will be held as high points, and the pipes will be sized at the time of the full system design. A permanent easement will be granted to the District wherever stormwater management and drainage facilities cross lands not owned by the District. Phase I stormwater management system is permitted. No lines will be extended beyond private properties boundaries.

pg. 5

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

Any excess balance of excavated material may be placed on the future portions of the site, or disposed of by such other means at the option and expense of the developer. The cost for disposing of excess soil from District excavation, including placing, grading, and compacting if required, will be the responsibility of the developer. District shall not finance cost of transporting excess soil onto private lots nor grading of private lots.

All stormwater reports and associated plans will need to be approved through the local Water Management District, St. Johns River Water Management District, the City of Melbourne, and will need to adhere to the latest state standards for water quality and nutrient removal. The stormwater system is fully designed and is permitted by the City of Melbourne and St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). Please refer to Section IV for ownership and maintenance responsibilities after construction certification.

Reclaimed Water System

The City of Melbourne Utilities Department has reclaimed water service capacity to service the Development for public use. The District will construct the master reclaimed water/irrigation system and retain ownership and maintenance responsibility. The reclaimed water system will include reclaim mains that run along throughout the Development and connects to the existing reclaimed main that runs along the internal canal. The overall reclaimed water design is complete. Please refer to Section IV for ownership and maintenance responsibilities after construction certification. Phase I reuse system is permitted.

Spine Road Roadway Improvements

There will be constructed approximately +/- 1,780 linear feet of a spine road that runs from the subdivision west to temporary round-a-about west of the canal and west of the central park lake bisects the Development with associated pavement section materials, concrete sidewalk, pedways, handicap ramps, concrete gutters, signage and striping , amenities along the roadway (exercise equipment, benches, etc.), as well as landscaping. The roadway will be owned and maintained by the District, but be open for public use and access. It is currently permitted as part of Phase I.

Public Right-of-Way Improvements

No public right-of-way improvements other than the Spine Road Roadway Improvements are currently proposed within the scope of District work. Any work necessary for anticipated residential neighborhoods will be the responsibility of the developer.

pg. 6

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

Entry Feature

Landscaping, irrigation, entry features, and walls at entrances and along the outside boundary of the development and roadways within the District will be funded and constructed by the District. Perimeter fencing will be provided at the site entrances, which will be funded, owned and maintained by the District. These improvements will be owned by the District. Phase I is permitted.

Parks

The District will provide funding, own and maintain a Central Park to include the following: parking areas, large pond, water fountain, pier, walking trails, covered trellis, exercise stations, benches, picnic tables, as well associated landscaping. This amenity is constructed as part of Phase I and is permitted. The Central Park will be owned and maintained by the District and will be available for public use and access.

Miscellaneous

The miscellaneous items accounted for within the scope of District’s work include fees for engineering, permitting, legal administrative, etc. and are assumed to be 10% of the sub total of construction costs. An added 15% contingency of the sub total of construction costs has also been included within this report. None of the aforementioned fees and contingency relate to the design or work performed or to be performed by the developer in connection with the developable lots or the systems internal to the single-family neighborhood unless specified otherwise in the previous sections.

Please note the estimated fees in this section do not include any fees associated with permitting; i.e. permit application fees, recording fees, etc. and shall be paid by the developer.

OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE AUTHORITY

The District will partially finance the construction of the below Public Infrastructure Improvements, as discussed in the earlier sections of the Report, and future ownership and maintenance responsibilities will be in accordance with Table 3 below.

TABLE 3 - OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE	
DESCRIPTION	FUTURE OWNERSHIP	FUTURE MAINTENANCE	
Water Distribution System	City of Melbourne	City of Melbourne	
Sanitary Sewer System	City of Melbourne	City of Melbourne	
Stormwater System	CDD	CDD	
Reclaimed Water System	CDD	CDD	
Spine Roadway	CDD	CDD	
Entry Feature	CDD	CDD	
Parks	CDD	CDD	

pg. 7

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

SUMMARY OF COSTS

The estimated cost of Public Infrastructure Improvements is listed below, broken down by category/system with an estimated total summation. Please note these costs are estimates based on the current understanding of the scope of the CDD infrastructure, along with a design of the aforementioned systems. Final site permitting for all of the proposed improvements has not been completed at this time, material costs are based upon the current average findings, and the final design will also be subject to city and governing jurisdictional approval.

Additionally, the below costs are based upon construction plans prepared in five separate phases and current direction regarding the scope of the District’s anticipated construction costs.

ITEM	ESTIMATED COST	
Phase 1		
Water Distribution System	$ 266,036.25	
Sanitary Sewer System Including Lift Station	$1,483,388.90	
Stormwater System*	$ 7,274,916.57	
Reclaimed Water System	$ 115,916.50	
Spine Road Roadway Improvements**	$ 1,075,629.00	
Entry Feature***	$1,500,000.00	
Public Park***	$ 750,000.00	
Sub Total Phase 1	$ 12,465,887.22	
		
Phase 2		
Water Distribution System	$509,729.75	
Sanitary Sewer System	$362,262.50	
Stormwater System*	$1,512,879.93	
Reclaimed Water System	$388,071.50	
Sub Total Phase 2	$2,772,943.68	
		
Phase 3		
Water Distribution System	$443,375.00	
Sanitary Sewer System	$729,374.75	
Stormwater System*	$1,700,847.59	
Reclaimed Water System	$396,590.25	
Sub Total Phase 3	$3,270,187.59	
		
Phase 4		
Water Distribution System	$332,006.50	
Sanitary Sewer System	$84,575.00	
Stormwater System*	$326,392.00	
Reclaimed Water System	$324,278.00	
Sub Total Phase 4	$1,067,251.50	
		
Phase 5 - Townhomes		
Water Distribution System	$373,972.00	

pg. 8

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

Sanitary Sewer System	$403,648.68	
Stormwater System*	$711,560.60	
Reclaimed Water System	$112,705.75	
Sub Total Phase 5 - Townhomes	$1,601,887.03	
		
Sub Total Phases 1-5	$21,178,157.02	
Construction Contingency @ 15%	$3,176,723.55	
Engineering, Surveying, and Misc. Fees at 10%	$2,117,815.70	
TOTAL SITE DEVELOPMENT	$26,472,696.28	
*Includes excavation of storm ponds, stockpiling, sodding lake banks, storm piping, structures
etc.	
**Includes landscaping but excludes irrigation	
*** Estimated budget excluding irrigation	

PERMITTING AND GOVERNMENTAL ACTION

Phase I subdivision for Mayfair is currently permitted and under construction. A summary of the required permits for site development can be found below, along with the current status of each respective permit. Please note that if a permit is needed for each phase or portion of the project as they are designed and permitted, it has been noted as such in the table.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

The proposed Public Infrastructure Improvements discussed in this Report are critical to the overall construction and functionality of the Mayfair development. The improvements are in phases designed in accordance with local, state and federal regulations, and permitted through all applicable regulatory agencies. As discussed in prior sections, the design is in

pg. 9

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

phases the preliminary stages and this report have been based upon the latest design drawings by Construction Engineering Group, LLC, Pollack Landscape Architecture and survey/plat by AAL Surveying.

The estimate of the proposed Public Infrastructure Improvements and associated construction costs has been provided based upon the current direction of the CDD, the developer and current status of the overall engineering design and permitting. The estimated costs are also based upon a mix of bids and unit prices experienced in the market at this time, for a similar scope of work in the same general area of Brevard County.

These costs are subject to change based upon timing, labor market fluctuations, construction industry trends, lead time for materials, the anticipated full design, and if the scope of work is updated in any way. Construction and final construction costs should be based only upon the approved construction drawings that have been permitted through all applicable agencies.
Based upon the current master plan for the Development, no additional changes to the existing future land uses are anticipated

The District will pay the fair market value or the actual cost of the Public Infrastructure Improvements whichever is less. It is our opinion that the proposed Public Infrastructure Improvements and their estimated costs are fair and reasonable and that landowners and residents living in the District will receive a direct and special benefit equal to or greater than the cost of the Public Infrastructure Improvements, and that the general public will also receive incidental benefits.

Should you have any questions about the information provided within this report, please feel free to contact me via email at jwise@cegengineering.com or by phone at 321-610-1760.

Jake Wise, P.E.
Construction Engineering Group, LLC.

pg. 10

Mayfair Community Development District – Engineering Report

EXHIBIT A
EXISTING CDD BOUNDARY AND 8.24 ACRE CONTRACTION

pg. 11

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING GROUP

Consulting Engineers

EXISTING CDD BOUNDARY AND 8.24 ACRE CONTRACTION

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, FLORIDA

IN RE: PETITION PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.046(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO CONTRACT THE BOUNDARIES
OF MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
	./

PETITION TO CONTRACT THE BOUNDARIES OF MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the Mayfair Community Development District, an independent special district established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "District"), by Ordinance No. 2007-20 passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Melbourne, Florida, on April 10, 2007, and located entirely within the City of Melbourne, Florida ("City"), hereby petitions the City Council of the City of Melbourne, Florida ("City CounciP'), pursuant to Section 190.046(1) of the Uniform Community Development Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes (the "Act"), to adopt an amendment to City Ordinance No. 2007-20 to contract the cun-ent boundaries of the District and in support thereof, hereby states as follows:
History and Basis for Petition. In 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No.

2007-20, establishing the District. This Petition requests that the City Commission adopt an ordinance amending the boundaries of the District to remove approximately 94.33 acres of land from the District boundaries ("Contraction Parcel"). The Contraction Parcel will not be a part of the community being developed within the District boundaries, will receive no special benefit from infrastructure improvements that may be funded by the District, and will not be assessed by

the District. There are currently no services that are being provided by the District in the area to be removed from the boundaries of the District. No special assessments are levied against the real property being removed from the boundaries of the District. For these reasons, the Petitioner petitions the City Council to amend the District's boundaries to contract approximately
94.33 acres from the District pursuant to Section 190.046, Florida Statutes.

Location and Size. The District is located entirely in the City and presently encompasses approximately 256.7 acres of land, as shown in the attached Exhibit 1, a sketch and legal description of the existing CDD boundaries. The metes and bounds description of the Contraction Parcel, consisting of approximately 94.33 acres, is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. After contraction, the District will encompass approximately 162;38 acres of land. The metes and bounds description of the proposed amended District boundaries following contraction is attached hereto as Exhibit 3 (the "Amended District").
Landowner Consent. Melbourne Healthcare Associates, LTD., a Georgia limited partnership, Southern Homes of Melbourne II, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Landowners") and City of Melbourne (the "City"), are the 100% owners of the lands comprising the Contraction Parcel. Documentation of consent from the Landowners is attached hereto as Composite Exhibit 4. The City is not defined as a landowner in section 190.003(14), Florida Statutes and therefore not required to provide an affidavit of consent. Additionally, the City's consent to the contraction of the District will be evidenced by the City Commission's the adoption of the ordinance pmsuant to section 190.046(1).
District Consent. The favorable action of the Board authorizing the filing of this Petition, as is evidenced by the copy of District Resolution No. 2024-07 attached hereto as

Exhibit 5, constitutes consent for all the Landowners within the District pursuant to Section 190.046(1)(g), Florida Statutes.
Future Land Uses. The designation of the future general distribution, location, and extent of public and private uses of land proposed for the Contraction Parcel by the future land use plan element of the City of Melbourne comprehensive plan are shown in Exhibit 6. Contraction of the District in the manner proposed in this Petition is not inconsistent with the adopted City of Melbourne comprehensive plan. Furthermore, all development within the Contraction Parcel and the Amended District will continue to be subject to the same development regulation, permitting requirements and zoning as administered by the State of Florida and the City following contraction of the District's boundaries.
District Facilities and Services: Assessments. No facilities or services are currently being provided by the District to the Contraction Parcel. No special assessments are levied against the Contraction Parcel.
Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is the statement of estimated regulatory costs ("SERC") in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes. The SERC is based upon presently available data.
This Petition to contract the boundaries of the District should be granted for the following reasons:
the contraction of the District boundaries will not be inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective City of Melbourne comprehensive plan;
the area of land comprising the District will be of sufficient size, compactness, and contiguity to be developable as one functional interrelated community;

DCT 2 4 W2t1
the District, as amended, will continue to present the best alternative available for delivering the community development facilities and services to the area that will be served by the District;
the community development facilities and services of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and
the area comprising the District will be amenable to separate special district government.
That all statements contained within this Petition are true and correct.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner, the Board of Supervisors of the Mayfair Community Development District, hereby respectfully requests the Commission to:
Direct its staff to notice, as soon as practicable, a local public non-emergency hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.046(1)(b) of the Act to consider whether to grant the petition for the contraction of the District's boundaries and to amend the Ordinance establishing the District to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
Grant this Petition and enact an ordinance pursuant to applicable law amending Ordinance 2007-20 to reflect the new boundaries of the District.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this Z /i:l-- day of OC+vh<1	, 2024.

MAYFAffi COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

By:/�	
Name?--	Ch  ,,-/_s	Cv ;.-1--,,C 
Title: Chairperson

EXHIBIT 1
SKETCH AND LEGAL EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES

EXISTING CDD	BOUNDARY

FLORIDA AVENUE
588°53157"£	3985.00'

POINT OF

' I<) C)

	BEGINNING		1£)
C)

NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT A.

-

MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR,

C\j

E-t

PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91

en' �

BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA	Vi
�

�
2; V) C\i

C\2
h	�
r.-.::i	�

CDD SUBJECT PARCEL

�
(.!)
�
Q::

ti)

�

c:i c:i C\j
���

u

Cl::�� Cl:: 0...
(./)	'

�	t3

256.70±  ACRES(M)
256.715:t ACRES (PER

0	L,_jc:i ._j "<;j-

�(Q

�	c..>	Gr--..

(/)

h	.�...

.�...

OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 5771, PAGE 994D)

�	ti)	V) ,_ I'..
��C)�

�  (l

(l	�	�	C)

"'

�	I	I

LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6159, PAGE 1011
R=500.00'

�2.62(

R=400.00' 0=42°57125" L=299.90'

�	�

,C\J
CQ
�
C)
�

._j	C)
Q:)

�"'"'

�

""�"'

c::ic::i"'

!)l;:):t"".:,�
�Q::
L.,J_.�"'
Cl"<: <o

"'aa

0=6°2012711	"1Qi:::

!3708.93'!J
10' WIDE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
PER O.R.B 7764, PAGE 2283

L=55.34'

PIRATE LANE

�tE
...J  C)
CXJ

NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1-J
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLYl	THIS	IS NOT A	SURVEYl
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,	INC.

THIS SKETCH AND DRAv.1NG HAVE BEEN PREPARED TD CONFORM Y,1TH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION

SHEET 1 OF 3

I		
���?�CEFt6RTtl �°c,R,.�1:ir:1�Lg�/ft. �B��EA�T P-fo°Fttt�?��L4��g2J.URm�JA Nsf:��:.
-	12, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DA TUM AND ON THE LINE SHOWN AS BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS.
J0DBATIE:4o852-2JoE2x-1s2TI4NG coo OVERALLI-AN--D_R_: EW :._W.:....:..P:.0..:WSH_:_..:.OK...:......::.:..:.... :	...:......::	:..: : .:..:..	..:..:3.:.9....:7_0 : M.:..IN..:...::..TO..:.N....:..::....:R..:.0..:.A:..D--t"------�--: 1
SCALE: 1" = 500'

sEcnON ,s. TO'M'<SHIP 285. RANGE :m	P.L.S. No. 5383	WEST MELBOURNE, FL. 32904
(321) 768-8110
L.B. ,,,_6623

liCRll:!

EXISTING CDD	BOUNDARY

FLORIDA AVENUE
S88"53'57"E

S88-S3'57"E
l.'lQ1 .-'>n' 1-.

h
�
�
ti)

�
0
l)

PARCEL ID:

-.-

l,28-37-75-00-252

�

-';)'
-C\j

i

I�

1�

}u
I.!)
�
0)
t')

C)

C)
�	:.::

LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 7638, PAGE 2397

CDD SUBJECT PARCEL
256.70±  ACRES(M)
256.775± ACRES {PER OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 5771, PAGE 9940)

....,

j

PIRATE LANE
10�;)/�_:o:�7:��HJAg:-2��j-

N88"46'27"W	13708.93'
10' WIDE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PER O.R.B 7764, PAGE 2283

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLY!	THIS	IS NOT  A	SURVEY!
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,	INC.

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 1. ll·HS SKETCH AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE S1TANDARDS OF

SHEET 2 OF 3

;��f;cEFt�Rf6l �ir:.�1:�l1ii�l\?�/i°t �3���A�T P.fc°F:tiw�t\½Ng2i.UR�6i�JA  ';,TC:�JE,f.

JOB I 48221 EXISTING COD OVERALL

BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM AND ON THE LINE SHOWN AS BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS.

3970 MINTON ROAD	�

DATE:05-02-24
SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28S, RANGE J7E

L.B. #6623

NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1-3

WEST MELBOURNE, FL. 32904
(321) 768-8110

SCALE: 1· = 500'

l'IQRil!

DESCRIPTION: EXISTING CDO BOUNOARY
TRACTS A ANO B, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO TH£ PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORO£D IN PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91, LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6159, PAGE 1011, omCJAL RECORDS BOOK 7638, PAGE 2397, A PORTION OF LANDS [)£SCRIBED IN omCIAL RECORDS BOOK 7764, PAGE 2279, ANO A PORTION OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7764, PAGE 2283, INCLUSIVE: OF TH£ PUBLIC RECOROS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MOR£ PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEO AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 00"58'27• ttEST, A DISTANCE OF 2015.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89YJ1'41• MEST. A DISTANCE OF 82,62 FEET TO TH£ POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE: CONCAVE: SOUTHEASTERLY, HAYING A RADIUS OF 400,00 FEET,· THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 299,90 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42"57'25• TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH
48'()0'54• HES'T, A DISTANCE OF 622.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A OISTANCE OF 55..14 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6"20'27" TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 88"46'27" J£S'T, A DISTANCE OF 3708.9.J FEET,• THENC£ NORTH 0039'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2061.11 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 88"53'57" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 591.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'40'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 515.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'53'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF :J985.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 256.70 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLY!	THIS  IS NOT  A SURVEY!	
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES, INC.	
		SHEET 3 OF 3	

-	12
JOB # 48221 EXISTING cop OVERALL
DATE:05-02-24
SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 2as, RAIIGE 37E	
. BE,'.RINOS ,'.RE' BASED ON ASSUMED DAn!M AND ON THE UNE SHOY,1-1 Af3 BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS.		
	NOT VALID WITHOUT	WEST	3970 MINTON ROAD
MELBOURNE, FL 32904
SHEETS 1-J	(321)  768-8110	�
SCALE: 1" = 500·	

		NQll.Il:I	

EXHIBIT2

METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACTION PARCELS

LIN£ TABLE	
UN£	BEARING	LENGTH	
L1	S00"58'27"W	150.00'	
L2	N89'01'41"W	82.62'	
Ll	S89-01'41"£	52.62	
LB	N00"5B'27"£	40.00	
L9	S89-01'41"£	30.00	

REMOVING FROM COD BOUNDARY

CURVE TABLE	
CURVE.	RADIUS	DELTA	LENGTH	CHORD	CHORD BEARING	
Ct	400.00'	42'57'25"	299.90'	292.92'	S69'29'36"W	
C2	500.00'	6"20'27"	55.34'	55.31'	S5111'0B"W	

FLORIDA AVENUE

IR,

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
NORTHEAST CORNER OF

saa·so•39"

MELBOURNE

TRACT A, CITY CENTER

AT MAYFAIR,

"W

h	-

C\l	".-E.

�

�

(()
(()

�	-(()

310.13'

PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91 BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

TRACT A,
MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91

588"45'35"£

R=510.00' D=42"57'25" L=382.371 C=373.47'

t"/J	}ll

§

B
�
C)

h

t3	C<) :

�

418.19'
SUBJECT PROPERTY
94.JJ:I: ACRES

OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6159, PAGE 1011

1	11

CB=N6979'36"£
LANDS DESCRIBED IN

R=390.00' 0=43'12 39
L=294.13' C=287.21' CB=N69"37'13"£
REMAINDER OF TRACT 8, MELBOURNE CITY
CENTER AT MAYFAIR,
PLAT BOOK 73,
PAGES 85-91
1045.36'
88'46127"£

NBB.46127"W 3708.93'
10' WIDE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
PER O.R.B 7764, PAGE 2283

G
PIRATE LANE

NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1-4

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLY!	THIS IS NOT A	SURVEY!

1, Tl-ilS SKETCH AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN PREPARED TD CONFORM Wlll-i APPLICAilLE STANDARDS OF

�3*��A�TPTi0

AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,	INC.

SKETCH or	DESCRIPTION

FtM�r �ii:..m1:'iR1��L�1Pt

"JtJW6'�L.1	1

SHEET 1 OF 4

itH-fu".J:.

��z�CE

��2J.UR�ii�iA

-	--12. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM AND ON THE LINE SHOWN AS BEING THE BASIS OF' BEARINGS,

��=-B�#�48�22�1=c=o□::::;;BE:Mo��:::::..,_J
0AlE:08-23-24
SECTIO� 15, TOWNSHIP 2BS, RANGE 37E
L.B. #6623

ANDREW W. POWSHOK
p LS  N	5"'8.3
' '  '	O,	oJ

3970 MINTON ROAD WEST MELBOURNE, FL. 32904
(.321) 768-8110

�
SCALE: 1" = 500'

i'lQB]Jj

REMOVING FROM COD BOUNDARY

FLORIDA AVENUE
s  88.53'57"  E

R£MAIND£R OF TRACT B, MELBOURN£ CITY
CENTER AT MAYFAIR,
PLAT BOOK 73,
S88"53'57''E	�	PAGES 85-91
II
POR110N OF	�
TRACT B	-	S89 •11'2711E
PARCEL ID:	LANDS DESCRIBED IN	�	{	94.00'
�	8-37-15-00-252	OFFICIAL RECORDS ,	�	00•42'33"W
�	�	BOOK 7638, PAGE 23tf;,55.00' ,.  v_'►\t	8.62,	�	�
�	:::;	0=44"28'51	.._
!"I)	R=25.00'	L	42	70'.-.\	44.97'	�1.,... I
I t-----+----r�"	0=42.50'00"	=	• :�i�'	543•45'18''f	� �.
�� II	L=18,69�'	��.,') �	s00·42'33''W �	��
')1 •	,	cc	o
i'--' I	R=5�.o�' ,,	CJ 1	/266.22	� s==
to	L=231.84	1	,	}I.I
}I.I	0=265 '40 0,1---......	S43"46'19"£	�
I	�	283•50	� SUBJ!
I	�	R=25.00'	-----.�. }I.I g.
I	�	D=42·5o'op"  N46"13'42''E	S89"16'22 £ � 6	"'- b
L=18.69	263'..04'	506.36.�.' �:i	�	����
I	SUBJECT PROPERTY	o; C'.J	� ""
I	94.33±  ACRES	cc�	Ct)
Lt) <::>
C:>
•. I -------...-1,.	...,..		...,.	,	V),._.	
PIRATE LANE	N88.46'27"W
10' WIDE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY	3708.93'
PER O.R.8 7764, PAGE 2283

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLYl	THIS IS NOT A SURVEY!	
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,	INC.	
,
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
-	�2
JOB # 48221 coo REMOVE	. mis SKETCH AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS Of
�,�rr.cErtMl! �?,F/,.1/�1:iR!'i1�ll8�/fl �3��eA�T p1'b°FJtJW�tL4wi)2f,UR�ii�A�Tfrtilf.	SHEET 2 OF 4	
			
	, BEARINGS ARE SASED ON ASSUMED DATUM -'ND ON 'lllE LINE SHOWN AS BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS.		
	NOT VALID WITHOUT
SHEETS 1-4	
WEST	3970 MINTON ROAD
MELBOURNE, FL .32904
(321) 76B-B110	�
SCALE: 1• = 500'	
DATE:08-23-24
SECTION 15, TOl',l,ISHIP 28S, �ANG( J7E					
L.B. #6623				twB.11:l	

REMOVING FROM COD BOUNDARY

LINE TABLE	
LINE	BEARING	LENGTH	
L3	S58".29'18"W	48.74	
L4	N56'17'18"W	25.52	
L5	S33'42'42"W	50.00	
L6	N88"54'00"W	135.70	

CURVE TABLE	
'CURVE	RADIUS	DELTA	LENGTH	CHORD	CHORD BEARING	
C3	50.00'	65i3'24"	56.92'	53.89'	S 88.54'00" E	
C4	25.00'	89"52'27"	39.21'	35.32'	S 45•09'46"  W	

I		
S88.4513511£
418.19'

.	�«b
�t;
�I		

� in It (0 .s:>

-.

C)

(0

��
"')-
&1
�	�-;	1�

Cl.

cl·

L6 V�	C3

��
�
1--
�

½'-1-- K..

�
" "')
�. �
&1

�

j

Q:: ct)	�
Li:i 1--
�t)
-"'(�
�

�

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION	ONLYJ	THIS IS NOT A  SURVEY!
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,	INC.

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION

1, lHIS SKETCH ANO DRA'hlNG HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO COMFORM 1'1111-i APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTI-i BY 11-iE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5.J-17,  FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027,  FLORIDA STATUTES,
2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUIIED OAnJM ANO ON lHE LINE SHOWN AS BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS,

SHEET J OF 4

JOB # �6221 QQQ BEMQ'.if
DATE:0B-23-24
SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28S, RANGE 37E
L.B. #6623

3970 MINTON ROAD
NOT VALID WITHOUT	WEST MELBOURNE, FL 32904
SHEETS 1-4	(321)  768-8110

SCALE: 1• = 500' �

l,lQflJli

DESCRIPTION: REUO'ANG FROM CDD BOUNDARY
A PORTION OF TRACTS A AND B, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYF'AIR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7.J, PAGES 85-91, LANDS DESCRIBED IN OfflC/AL RECORDS SOOK 6159, PAGE 1011, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7638, PAGE 2.J97, A PORTION OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OfflC/Al RECORDS SOOK 7764, PAGE 2279 AND A POR710N OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7764, PAGE 2283, INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARL ):' DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'58'27• NEST, A DISTANCE OF 1865.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL,· THENCE CONT1NUE SOUTH 00"58'27• WEST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'01'41" W£ST, A DISTANCE OF 82.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVAnJRE OF A CURVE: CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HA'ANG A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
42'57'25� THENCE SOUTHWES'TERL Y ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 299.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 48'00'54" HEST, A DISTANCE OF 622,99 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVA nJRE OF A CURVE CONCA\,£' NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500,00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6'20'2r, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 55.J4 FEET TO A POINT,· THENCE NORTH 88'46'27" NEST, A DISTANCE OF .J708.9.J FEET; THENCE NORTH OO'J9'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2061.11 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 88'53'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 591.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'40'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 515.00 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 88'53'57• EAST, A DISTANCE OF 691.75 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00'42'.J.J" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1061.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89"17'27• EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00"42'.J.J" !+EST, A DISTANCE OF 8.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVAnJRE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEAS'TERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANG/.£ OF 44'28'51�· THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC 42.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY,· THENCE SOUTH
43'46'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF #.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46"1.J'-#2" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 7.Jl.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42"50'00; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC 18.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCA\,£ NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 265'40'01"; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC 231,84 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CUR'£ CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAYING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42'50'00"; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC f8.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 46"1.J'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 263.04 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 00'42'»• KEST, A DISTANCE OF 266.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4.JWJ'fg• EAST, A DISTANCE OF
283.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'16'22• EAST, A DISTANCE OF 506.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'42'3.J• KEST, A DISTANCE OF 589.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'46'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF '15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00•42•33•
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1668.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'50'.J9• EAST, A DISTANCE OF 310.1.J FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'43'.19" IEST, A DISTANCE OF 848.0:J FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'45'J5• EAST, A DISTANCE OF 418.19 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01YJ6'00• WEST, A DISTANCE OF .J12,65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58'29'f8" KEST, A DISTANCE OF 48.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVA nJRE OF A CURVE CONCA\£ NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65"13'24� THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 56.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY,• THENCE NORTH 56"17'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.52 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 3.J'42'42" NEST, A
DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 88'54'oo· KEST, A DISTANCE OF 1.J5.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVAnJRE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'52'20 THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 39.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF TAN.GENCY,· THENCE SOUTH 01'13'»• IEST, A DISTANCE OF 427.4-J FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'46'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1045.J6 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATUR£ OF A CURVE CONCA\,£' NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF J90,00
FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43"12'.J9�· THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 294.13 FEET TO
THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 48"00'54• EAST, A DISTANCE OF 622.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVA1URE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HA'ANG A RADIUS OF 510.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42'57'25; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 382..J7 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY;
THENCE SOUTH 89'01'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 52.62 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 00"58'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 89'01'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF J0.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 94.» ACRES. MORE OR LESS.

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLYl	THIS IS NOT A	SURVEY!	
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES, INC.	
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
JOB # 48221 CDP REMOVE	
11-ilS SKETCH AND DRA'MNG HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM 'MTIJ APPLICABLE STAN1DARDS OF
���f;c\t�RT�I �ii��1:lR;l;tfvl\?t�� �s��eA�TPT�FJtJW��L4¼'.W2{uRmi�iA Nsg��:.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATIJM AND ON THE UNt SfiO'wtl AS BEING lHE BASIS OF BEARINGS.	SHEET 4 OF 4	
			
	NOT VALID WITHOUT	WEST	J970 MINTON ROAD
MELBOURNE, FL .32904
SHEETS 1-4	(J21)  768-8110	�
SCALE: 1" = 500'

l,IOB]J:!	
DATE: 08-23-24
SECllON 15, TOWNSHIP 211S, RANGE 37E			
L.B. #6623			

EXHIBIT 3

METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION NEW DISTRICT BOUNDARIES

NEW	COD	BOUNDARY.

FLORIDA AVENUE
SB8"53'57"E	3293.24'

POINT  OF
	BEGINNING	
NORTI-/CAST CORNCR OF rRACT A,
MELBOURNE: CITY CCNT£R AT MAYFAIR, PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91 BRE:VARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

J"E

NBB"50'39"W
310.13'

TRACT A

SUBJECT PROPERTY
162.38± ACRES N89.01'41"W
52.62'
R=510.00' 0=42"57'25" L=382.37'

R=390.00' D=43i2'39" L=294.1J'

500"58'27"W
40.00'

NBB.46'27"W
115.00'

NBB'46'27"W 1045.361

PIRATE  LANE

NOT VAL/0 WITHOUT SHffTS 1-1
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLYl	THIS IS NOT A SURVEY!
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,	INC.

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION

l. nus  SKETCH AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM Win➔ APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF
���rJ'.CEF�5Rft! �iit�1:iR��/t.gg[l'l �3��BAii\Pfo°FJ=:iw�tl 4�1NR2¥.UR¥Eii�tA1NsT��TlEf.

SHEET 1 OF 4

----------12, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATUM AND ON lHE LINE SHOWN AS BEING TflE BASIS OF BEARINGS.

JOB H 48221 CDD REMAIN
a::::D�AT�E:=08�-�23=-=24:!::!:�::!:..- I
SEcnoN rn. TOWNsH1P ws. llaNGE 37E

ANDREW W. POWSHOK
P.L.S. No. 5383

3970 MINTON ROAD WEST MELBOURNE, FL 32904
(321) 768-8110

�
SCALE: 1• = 500'

liQfilll

NEW	COD	BOUNDARY

LINE TABLE	
LINE	BEARING	LENGTH	
L1	s8a·54 'oo"E	135.701	
L2	N33"42'4211E	50.001	
L3	S56"17'1B"E	25.52'	
L4	N58"29118"£	48.74'	

CURVE TABLE
CURVE		RADIUS		DELTA		LENGTH		CHORD	 CHORD BEARING C1	25.00'	89'52127"	39.211	35.321	N46"09'46"£
C2	50.001	55·13'24"	56.921	53.89'	SBB'54 'oo"E
  I	
NB8"45'35"W
418.19'	}tJ

-�

- l{)  <::i
I{) -

REMAINDER OF

�  ((J	I�
IV)-

<'.

.	TRACT B	C)
j�
\j \	 L1 �	C2	(�

�I.IJ
½""�t-,

PORTION OF

TRACT A	I

"(\j Irv-'-)	TRACT 8
""t- ....
�

305.03'

740.32'
N88"46'27"W	1045.36'

PIRATE	LANE
l
SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLYl	THIS IS NOT	A	SURVEY!
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,	INC.

SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION

THIS SKETCH ANO ORAV,,NG HAVE BEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM WITH APPI.ICABL.E STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH SY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAi. LAND SURVEYORS 1"1 CHAPTER ll,J-17,  FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATIJTES.
SEARINGS ARE BASEO ON ASSUMED DI>.TUM /\ND ON THE LINE SHOWN AS BEING THE B1>.SlS OF SEARINGS.

SHEET 2 OF 4

JOB   #  ia.V.L.C.0�
DATE:08-23-24
SECTIOH15, TOYINSHIP 26S, RANGE 37E
L.S. #6623

3970 MINTON ROAD
NOT VALID WITHOUT	WEST MELBOURNE, FL 32904
SH££TS 1-4	(.321)  768-8110

SCALE: 1" " 500' �

l!OO!l!

NEW	COD	BOUNDARY

FLORIDA  AVENUE
S88·t

PARCEi. ID:
8-37-15-00-252
R=55.00'
0=44 28'51"�--\(
R=25.00'	L=42.70',,� D=42.50'00"		,ti<i '
L=18.69'	.,'S i'
R=50.00'	�	��'o,f:,'\·
D=265"40'01"	--	�
L=231.B4'--------:

R=25.00'
D=42•5o'o?" s45·13'42"w L=18.69	263.04'

NB8'46'27"W
PIRATE  LANE	115.00'

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLY!	THIS IS NOT A	SURVEY!	
AAL  LAND SURVEYING  SERVICES,	INC.	
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION	I. THIS SKETCH AND DRAWING HA\/E BEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF
���ilcE,tM�l  �iimr:lRnl\J\�)�/l't.�3;��A�l\ Pfo°Fftti%'�L.�.  1Ng2J�R�iifJAINsfl'tJ'�;f.	SHEET 3 OF 4	
			
-	1�-
JOB 6 48221 COD REMAIN	BEAlllNGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED O"-TUM AND ON THE LINE SHO\\N AS BEING TKE 8"-SIS OF BEARINGS.		
	NOT VALIO WITHOUT
SHEETS 1-4	WEST	3970 MINTON ROAD
MELBOURNE, .FL 32904
(.321) 768-8110	�
SCALE: 1· = 500'

lfilllil1	
0ATE:OB-23-24
SECnOH 15, TOV.NSHIP 2BS. R"-NGE 37E					
L.B. #662:3					

-

DESCRIPTION: NEW CDD BOUNDARY
ALL OF TRACT A AND A PORTTON OF TRACT 8, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO TH£ PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, Fl.OR/DA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL,· THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'58'27" M'ST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIPSCOMB STREET, A DISTANCE OF 1,865.03 FEET,· THENCE RUN ALONG TH£ NORTH RIGHT OF WAY UN£ OF PIRATE LANE FOR TH£ FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) CALLS: NORTH 89'01'41" Wf"ST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'58'27" Wf"ST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 89'01'41" Kf'ST, A DISTANCE OF 52.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATUR£ OF A CURVE CONCA VE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42'57'25� THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 382.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY: THENCE SOUTH 48"00'54" W£ST, A DISTANCE OF 622.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF
CURVA TUR£ OF A CURVE CONCA VE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 390.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
43'12'39� THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 294.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 88'46'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1045.36 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 01iJ'JJ" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
427.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVA TUR£ OF A CURVE CONCA VE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVJNG A RADIUS OF
25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'52'27� THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 39.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 88'54'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 135,70 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 33'42'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56'17'18" £AST, A DISTANCE OF 25.52 FE£T TO THE POINT OF CURVA TUR£ OF A CURVE CONCA VE NORTHEASTERLY, HAV!NG A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65iJ'24'; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG TH£ ARC A DISTANCE OF 56.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY,· THENCE NORTH 58'29'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 48,74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'06'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 312.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'45'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 418.19 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 00'43139" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 848.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'50'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 310.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'42'.JJ" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1668.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88'46'27 Kf'"S� A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'42'3.J" £AST, A DISTANCE OF 589.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'16'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 506.36 FEET,- THENCE NORTH 43'46'19" Kf'"ST, A DISTANCE OF 283.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'42133" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 266.22 FEET,• THENCE SOUTH 46'13'42" W£ST, A DISTANCE OF
263.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00
FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42'50'00�• THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 18.69 FffT TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVA TUR£ OF A CURVE CONCA V£ NORTHEASTERLY HAV/NG A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 265'40'01�· THENCE ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 231.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42'50'00"; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC 18.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY THEREOF,· THENCE NORTH 46'13'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 737.21 FEET,- THENCE NORTH 43'46'18" �ST, A DISTANCE OF 44.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44'28'51"; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC 42.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 00'42'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.62 FEET,· THENCE NORn-t 89'17'27" K£ST, A DISTANCE OF 94.00 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 00'42'33" £AST, A DISTANCE OF 1061.15 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 88'53'57" EAST ALONG TH£ SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FLORIDA AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 3293.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 162.38 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLYI	THIS IS NOT A SURVEY!	
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES, INC.	
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION	1, THIS SKETCH AND ORAWINO HAVE DEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF
��.'.:f�CEFt�R�l �iRJi�1:lRl:ii\[Lg�1,D���s��S,,'?fr PfJ>".ftJW��L4�N82f.uRmi�i..1't-rl�riff	SHEET 4 OF 4	
			
	2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED OA TUM AND ON THE LINE SHOWN AS BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS,		
JOB # 48221 COD REMAIN
DA TE: 08-23-24
SECTION lfi, TO�SHIP 28S, RANGE 37E			
	NOT VALID WITHOUT	WEST		3970 MINTON ROAD MELBOURNE, FL 32904
SHEETS 1-4	(321)  768-8110	�
SCALE: 1" � 500'	
L.B. *6623		IWl!JlJ	

EXHIBIT4 CONSENT OF LANDOWNERS

J •

AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND CONSENT

On this  2_ day of c-J �.,....,,� , 2024, Gerardo Aguirre ("Affiant") personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements, who, after being duly sworn, deposes and says:

Affiant is the Manager of Southern homes Management LLC, a Florida limited liability company, as Manager of Southern Homes of Melbourne II, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the "Owner").

The Owner is the fee title owner of the following described property, to wit: See attached hereto as Exhibit"�' (the "Property")
Affiant hereby represents that he has full authority to execute all documents and instruments on behalf of the Owner, including this Affidavit pursuant to Section 190.046(1 ), Florida Statutes, for the Petition to contract the boundaries of the Mayfair Community Development District (the "COD") by the City Council of the City of Melbourne, Florida.

Affiant, on behalf of the Owner, hereby consents  external boundaries of Mayfair Community Development ff  rict o e  ude the  roperty therein.

By: 		 ,.	 _

Name: Gera Title:

gume
of Southern Homes Management LLC, a limited liability company, as Manager of

Sout	m Homes of Melbourne II, LLC a Florida limi) d liability company

STATE OF �\Q-<ido�	) COUNTY OF �	c.-rr,,,,.- vQ,.4.	)

/Jai-..�

Theforegoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of [  physical presence or [ ] on line notarization this J_ day of th::ivet'hb.(L., 2024 by Gerardo Aguirre, as Manager of Southern Homes Management, LLC, a Florida limited liability cornQany, as Manager of Southern Hornes of Melbourne II, LLC, a Florida limited liability company.  e is  ersonall   nown torn  [  ] or produced
asidentification.	{�	Q_
p1,1blic State of Florida	6\(--1	-		

L

Notary Maria Saiz	2	Nota�ub"iie,  ;,	("'	,.,
My commission HH 38953	G
Ellpires 8/1512027	�	 CL -	6...:
Typed, printed or stamped name of Notary Public

EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Property to be removed from the District Boundary

A PORTION OF TRACT B, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A: THENCE RUN NORTH 88°53'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2628.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°42'33" WEST, A DISTANC OF 902.23 FEET TO TIIE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRlBED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 88°50'39;' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 310.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°43'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 848.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°45'3Y' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 418.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°06'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 312.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°29' 18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 48.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°13'24", THENCE NORTHWSTERL Y ALONG THE ARC OF A DISTANCE OF 56.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 56°17'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33°42'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°54'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 135.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°52'2T', THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 39.21 FEET TO THE POIT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 01°13'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
427.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°46127'�WEST, ADISTANCE:OF 417.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°42'33', EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1668.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND CONSENT
On this 31 day of vcfo ber , 2024, Leslie R. Partee ("Affiant") personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgements, who, after being duly sworn, deposes and says:

Affiant is the Manager SBK of Georgia, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company, as General Partner of Melbourne Healthcare Associates, LTD., a Georgia limited partnership (the "Owner").

The Owner is the fee title owner of the following described property, to wit: See attached hereto as Exhibit "11"(the "Property")
Affiant hereby represents that she has full authority to execute all documents and instruments on behalf of the Owner, including this Affidavit pursuant to Section 190.046(1), Florida Statutes, for the Petition to contract the boundaries of the Mayfair Community Development District (the "CDD") by the City Council of the City of Melbourne, Florida.

Affiant, on behalf of the Owner, hereby consents to the contraction of the external boundaries of Mayfair Community Development District to exclude the Property therein.

STATE OF (,eo,S')''-"-
COUNTY OF C,�oi.c.:l.e...

By:�	
Name: Leslie R. Partee
Title: Manager of SBK of Georgia, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company, as General Partner of Melbourne Healthcare Associates, LTD, a Georgia limited partnership

)
)

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of [{physical presence or [ ] online notarization, this3i51 day of Qc_\-o\::> e.r  , 2024, by Leslie R. Partee, as ManagerofSBK of Georgia, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company, as General Partner ofMelg.ourne Healthcare Associates, LID, a Georgia limited partnership. He/She is personally known to me[✓] or produced 	 as identification.

Notary Public
-5::,.(Ylb..n::\ry:,-. L. I-\{. f-h.u, /llJ  1-c,A	
Typed, printed or stamped name of Notary Public

EXHIBIT "N'

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Property to be removed from the District Boundary
FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN ON A BEARING EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 314.00 FEET; THENCE S 0°26145° E A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE ON A BEARING OF EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 436.00'FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2290, PAGE 1487, PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S 0°26'45" E ALONG THE
.CENTERLINE OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 515.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HERElN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUES S 0°26'45" E ALONG THE CENTERLlNE OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF
184.09 FEET; THENCE ON A BEARING OF WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 591.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°25'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 184.09 FEET; THENCE ON A BEARING OF WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 591.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

ALSO DESCRIBED AS:

A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (J/4) OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BREYARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 37 EAST, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S.88°53'57"E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 750.00 FEET; THENCE S.00°3912511W., ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THAT 100.00 FOOT DRAINAGE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2290, PAGE 1487, OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS, A DISTANCE OF 565.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S.88°53'57"E., ALONG A L1NE 565.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLELWlTH SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 591.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT 66.00 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2859, PAGE 2677, OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS AND A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE"QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4), OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE S.00°40'58"W., ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (l/4), OF SAID SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 184.08 FEET; THENCE N.88°53'57"W., ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT 20.00 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2886, PAGE 1618 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7743, PAGE 1009, BOTH OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS, A DISTANCE OF 591.47 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID CENTER LJNE OF DRAINAGE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2290, PAGE 1487, OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE N.00°3912511E., ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, A DISTANCE OF 184.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

EXHIBIT 5

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BOJ\RD OF SUPERVISORS

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-07

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AUTHORIZING DISTRICT COUNSEL AND DISTRICT STAFF TO FILE A PETITION TO AMEND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT WITH CITY OF MELBOURNE, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.046, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDE FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the Mayfair Community Development District ("District") has received a request from landowners within the District to amend the boundaries of the District with the removal of certain property from the boundaries of the District; and
WHEREAS, the District currently encompasses a total of approximately 256.7 acres located entirely within the boundaries of City of Melbourne (the "City"); and
WHEREAS, the District Board of Supervisors ("Board") has determined that it is in the best interests of the District to amend the boundaries of the District to remove approximately 94.33 acres from the District; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THAT:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals clauses are true and correct and are hereby • incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

SECTION 2. The District hereby authorizes, ratifies and confirms the filing with City of Melbourne, Florida, of a petition to amend the boundaries of the District to exclude the area described ln Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Contraction Area") in accordance with Section 190.046, Florida Statutes.

SECTION 3. Provided that the petition to contract referenced herein is actively being prepared and processed for consideration by the City of Melbourne, for as long as the Contraction Area remains a part of the District, the District hereby covenants not to issue any additional debt secured by additional assessments levied on the Contraction Area.

SECT)ON 4. The proper District officials are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.

§ECTION 5.	All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.

SECTION 6. If any clause, section or other part or application of this Resolution is held by court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or as applied, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Resolution.

SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.

THIS RESOLUTION WAS PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF AUGUST, 2024.

/;
By: �L

,_-

MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Cht1S Cutter 	
_	By: Chris Cutler (Aug 27, 202416:54 EDT)

Luis Hernandez, Secretary

Print name:	Chris Cutler
ChairpersonNice Chairperson

Exhibit "A" Contraction Parcel

DESCR/P110N: REMOVING FROM COD BOUNDARY
A POR110N OF TRACTS A AND B, MELBOURNE CITY CEN'TER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7� PAGES BJ-91, LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6159, PAGE 1011, OFFTCJAL RECORDS BOOK 76:JB, PAGE 2397, A PORTION OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7764, PAGE 2279 ANO A PORTION OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7764, PAGE 2283, INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTTCULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00"58'27" ltEST, A DISTANCE OF 1865,0J FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL.· THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 00'58'31" Kf'ST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 F&T; THENCE NORTH 89"01'41" ff£'ST, A DISTANCE OF 82.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
42"57'25: THENCE SOUTHff£'STERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 299.90 FEET ro THE POINT OF TANGENCY:
THENCE SOUTH 48"00'54" J+f'ST, A DISTANCE OF 622,99.FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CUR'VE CONCAVE NORTHWES'TERL >: HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6"20'27� THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 55.34 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH se•46'27" ff£'ST, A DISTANCE OF J708.9J
FEET; THENCE NORTH OO"J9'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2061.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8853'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 591.56 FEET,· THENCE NORTH 00•40'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 515.00 FEET; mENCE SOUTH 88"53'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 691.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00•42'33" fff'ST, A DISTANCE OF 1061.15 FEET,• THENCE SOUTH 89'17'27"
£AST, A DISTANCE OF 94.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00"42'33" ff£'ST, A DISTANCE OF 8.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATUR£ OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEAS'TERL Y HAVING A·RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF #"28'51; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC 42.70 FE£T TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 43'46'18" £AST, A DISTANCE OF' 44.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4613'42" Kf"ST, A DISTANCE OF' 737.21 FEET ro THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF' A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHHE'S'TERY HAVING A RADIUS OF' 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANG/..£ OF 42"50'00"; THENCE SOUTHHE'S'TERLY ALONG TH£ ARC 18.69 FEET TO TH£ POINT OF' REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHE'ASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF' 265'4-0'ot•: THENCE SO{JTHEASERL Y ALONG TH£ ARC 231.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEAS'TERL Y HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42"50'00"; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC 18.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 4613'42" £AST, A DISTANCE OF 26:J.04 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00•42'.J.J" HE'ST, A DISTANCE .OF'266.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43•46'19• EAST, A DISTANCE OF 28J,50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8918'22" EAST. A DISTANCE OF',506.JB FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00•42'33" �ST, A D/SrANCE OF 589.76 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 8,8.46'27" EAST, A: DISTANCE OF 1'5.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00"42'3.J"
EAST, A·01STANCE OF 1668.11 FEET; THENC£! SOUTH 88"50'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 310.13 FEET,· THENCE SOUTH 00'4J'39" tEST, A DISTANCE OF 848.o:J FEET: THENCE SOUTH 88•45'.J5" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 418.19 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01'06'00" ff£'ST, A DISTANCE OF 312.65 FE£T: THENC£ SOUTH 58."29'18" ff£'ST, A DISTANCE OF 48.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATUR£ OF' A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEAS'TERL Y, HAVING A RADIUS OF' 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGI.£ OF 6513'24� THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 56.92 FEET TO THE POINT
OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 5617'18" ff£'ST, A DISTANCE OF 25.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33•42'42• fff"ST, A
DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 881U'OO" fff'ST, A DISTANCE OF 135.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEAS'TERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 ·FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'52'27� THENCE SOUTHW£S'TERL Y ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 39,21 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY;
THENCE SOUTH 0113'33" Kf"ST, A DISTANCE OF 427.4:J FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88':46'27" £AST, A DISTANCE OF 1045.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CUR'VE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 390.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4312'39�• THENCE NORTHEAS'TERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 294.tJ FEET TO
THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 48"00'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 622.99 FEET ro THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF' A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42'57'25"; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF .J82.J7 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY;
THENCE SOUTH 89TJ1'41" EAST, A D/STANC£ OF 52.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'58'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89TJ1'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF' JO.OD FEET TO TH£ POINT, OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 94,33 ACR� MORE iOR LESS.

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION	ONLY!	THIS IS NOT A	SURVEY!	
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES, INC.	
SKETCH Of DESCRIPTION	1, THIS SKETCH AND DRAWING H.I.VE BEEN PREPARED TO CONFORM WITH APPLICABLE 'STANDARDS OF	SHEET 4 OF 4	
	�����CEF�M1U ��Mm,r�m�-lL8�1PE� �s��B�r PM�tJ�0��L4�f82{UR�);��JAINs.f4�-M!		
			
-	12.	8EA)IINGS ARE 8ASED ON ASSU�ED DATUM ANO ON '!HE LINE SHOWN AS BEING '!HE BASIS Of BEARINGS,		
,JOB# 48221 coo REMOVE			
	NOT VALID mTHOUT SHEETS 1-4	,	WEST	.3970 MINTON ROAD
MELBOURNE, 'FL .32904
(.321), 768-8110	�
SCALE: 1" � 500'	
DAlE:04-01-24
SECTION115. TO\\llSHIP 26S, RANGE 37E					
				�	
L.B. #6623					

-

--�?.11a�'fl',_,..,, _...,,.

•

,..,	••------=----e•·•:n•-..•.""'*""'"m""""''°"..  ,.,._=:"'"""'mli'-''"--·-"'·"'i_

202·4�07 ,(Art1e:nd District Boundari,es)LH

I
R6bln'Ftiildiilan(tfriii,dril'�r\@gmsstccim)•-
Slgri.�d _.

.	.. ''	.  .

j.

·csJCHBCAABAAMw•CJri\(jiihsP3ZJ2riAJR�yP5BRWIHT

!

•

Final Audif'Rsp,ort	2024�08-27

Status:
Traiisii.ctlon-'IC);

"2024-:07 (Amend District Boundarles)LH'' History
�  Documentcreated byRobin Friedman (rfriedman@gmssf.com)
2024-08-27 - 8:39:13 PM GMT

Cl Document emailed to l,.uis Hernandez (lhernandez@gmssf.com) for signature
20.24_-08-27 - 8:39117 PM:GMT

t'I Emai1.•vi�wad:biLt1iJ1.H�rn�J'ic:l�z:(tnetnatic1ez@gmssf.�n:i)
2024;0$-2'1- 8I40:;()1PM Oh.ff

0'0 Document e�slg,nedbyhiisJ;ernandez/{ihernandaz.@9rnssf.com)
S fgnaltira Date: 2024-06-27 , 8:40:23 PM GMT, Time Soufoe:.server

g	DoctJi'ner:it .emailed to Griris,Gu1ler (chris.n9tler@!'ennar.com) for signature
2024--0817 - 8_:40:25PM.GMT

t:l Email -iiewedbyChris•'Outler (dlris:cutler@lennar\tom)
2024-08°27:'- B:52il20PM,GMT

SG Document��signad by:Chris Quff13r {chri�.m,dler@Jennqr,Gom)
Signature Date: 2024-08-27 • 8.i54:12 PM GMT " Ttma sour.ce: servat

�� Agreement completed.
2024-08-27 • 8:54:12 PM GMT

�

i

�:

f,

)	I

	_J
(	._:._A_d_o_b_e_A_c_ro_b_at_s_ig_n

EXHIBIT6

FUTURE LAND USE

CoM Zoning & Future Land User Viewer

I •

J:	. I	I
I. •I	I

R2T

c:.

I. I.
I. I•

R1B	,---J
I	R2

I	I
rJ

9/11/2024, 5:17:18 PM	1:9,028

Future Land Use Designations	Medium Density Residential -	Industrial
Urban Edge	-	High Density Residential	Public/Institutional

0	0.05	0.1	0.2 mi

0	0.1	0.2	0.4 km

Estate Residential Agricultural
-	Conservation
Low Density Residential

Mixed-Use
-	General Commercial Office/Professional Heavy Commercial

Recreation
L-:-� Zoning Districts
fZ:d Conditional Uses	Esri, HERE, Garmin. INCREMENT P, lntermap. NGA, USGS

ArcGIS Web AppBuilder Esri. HERE. Garmin. INCREMENT P. lntermap, NGA. USGS I

EXHIBIT7
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS

Introduction

Purpose and Scope

This Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs ("SERC") supports the petition to contract the boundaries of the Mayfair Community Development District ("District"). The District currently comprises approximately 256.7+/- acres of land located in the City of Melbourne, Florida. This SERC is specific for one (1) area to be removed consisting of approximately 94.33 +/- acres.

The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), Florida Statutes ("F.S.") governing District establishment) as follows:

"That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be fair and based only on factors material to managing and financing the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or planning of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added)."

Overview of Mayfair Community Development District

The District is designed to provide district infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance to a planned residential development. The proposed area of removal will not be a part of the residential community within the District.

Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
·,
Section 120.541(2), F.S., defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain:
An economic analysis showing whether the ordinance directly or indirectly;

Is likely to have an adverse impact on economic growth, private sector job creation or employment or private sector investment in excess of $1 million in aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule1;

Is likely to have an adverse impact on business competitiveness, including the ability of persons doing business in the state to compete with person doing business in

1 For the purposes of this SERC, the term "rule" means the ordinance which the City of Melbourne will enact in connection with the contraction of the boundaries of the District.

other states or domestic markets, productivity, or innovation in excess of$1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule; or

Is likely to increase regulatory costs, including any transactional costs in excess of
$1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule.

A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule.

A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency2, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues.

A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the proposed rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting.

An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. Miami-Dade County is not defined as a small County for purposes of this requirement.

Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.

In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good faith written proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement adopting the alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed rule.
2.0   (a) An economic analysis showing whether the rule directly or indirectly is likely to
(1) have an adverse impact on economic growth, private sector job creation or employment, or private sector investment in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule; (2) have an adverse impact on business competitiveness, including the ability of persons doing business in the state to compete with persons doing business in other states or domestic markets, productivity, or innovation in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after implementation of the rule; or (3) increase regulatory costs, including any transactional costs, in excess of $1 million in the aggregate within 5 years after the implementation of the rule.

2 For the purposes of this SERC, the term "agency" means the City of Melbourne.

It is unlikely the boundary amendment will meet any of the triggers in Section 120.541(2)(a), F.S.. The basis for this determination is provided in the discussions in Section 3.0 through Section 6.0 herein.

A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule.

The District currently serves land that comprises a 256.7 +/- acre development. Upon approval of the petition to contract the boundaries, the District's boundaries will comprise approximately 162.38+/- acres. This boundary amendment will remove an area of land from the District boundary and will not be a part of the community in the District.

A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state or local revenues.
There is no state agency promulgating any rule relating to this project that is anticipated to affect state or local revenues.
Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Rule

State Governmental Entities
Since the District already exists, there will be no additional ongoing costs to various State governmental entities to implement and enforce the proposed boundary amendment. Further, the District comprises less than 2,500 acres, and therefore, City of Melbourne is the establishing entity under 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, to review and act upon the petition to contract the boundaries of the District.
There are minimal additional ongoing costs to various State entities to implement and enforce the proposed rule. The District is a special purpose unit of local govermnent, and it is required to file various reports with the State of Florida, the Department of Economic Opportunity and other agencies of the State. However, the additional costs to the State and its various departments to process the additional filing from the District are very low, since the State routinely processes filings from over 500 similar districts.

City of Melbourne

There will be only modest costs to the City for several reasons. First, review of the petition to contract the boundaries of the District does not include analysis of the project itself. Second, the petition itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. Third, the City already possesses the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new staff. Fourth, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally, the City routinely process similar petitions though for entirely different subjects, for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than the petition to contract an existing community development district.

There are no annual costs to City because of the proposed contraction of the boundaries of the District. The District is an independent unit of local government. The only annual costs the City faces are the minimal costs of receiving and reviewing the various reports that the District is required to provide to the City, or any monitoring expenses the City may incur if it establishes a monitoring program for this District. The City may incur certain advertising costs associated with the processing of the Petition to Contract the District Boundaries.

Impact on State and Local Revenues

Adoption of the proposed rule will have no negative impact on state or local revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed to provide infrastructure facilities and services to serve the development project, and it has its own sources of revenue. No state or local subsidies are required or expected.

A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of tbe rule.
Transactional costs associated with community development districts are typically related to the financing and maintenance of infrastructure. When the petition to form the District was originally submitted and approved by the City, the petitioner estimated the design and development costs for providing capital facilities. In this case, the area being removed from the District has no assessments for debt imposed thereon.
An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S.

There will be no impact on small businesses because of the proposed contraction of the boundaries of the District.

The development is located in the City of Melbourne. As of the Census date, the 2020 Census, the City has a population that is greater than 10,000 people. Therefore, the City is not defined as a "small" City according to Section 120.52, Florida Statutes, and there will accordingly be no impact on a small City because of the proposed amendment of the boundaries of the District.

Any additional useful information.

The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits.

MASTER ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

FOR

MAYFAIR

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

May 7, 2026

Prepared by

Governmental Management Services-South Florida, LLC 5385 N Nob Hill Road
Sunrise, FL 33351

1.0	Introduction

The Mayfair Community Development District (the “District”) is a local unit of special-purpose government organized and existing under Chapter 190, Florida Statutes as amended. The District anticipates issuing approximately $28,000,000 in special assessments bonds in one or more series (the “Bonds”) for the purpose of financing certain infrastructure improvements for the benefit of the assessable lands within the Contracted Area, herein defined, of the District, more specifically described in the March 5, 2026 Engineer’s Report for Mayfair Community Development District prepared by Construction Engineering Group as may be amended and supplemented from time to time (the “Engineer’s Report”). The District anticipates the acquisition and/or construction of infrastructure improvements consisting of community wide improvements that benefit all property owners within the Contracted Area of the District.

Purpose

This report (the “Master Methodology Report” or “Report”) provides a methodology that determines the amount of community development district debt relating to the Bonds to be allocated to specific properties within the District. The improvements are being constructed as one system of improvements benefiting all of the developable property within the Contracted Area of the District. This Report is designed to comply to the requirements of Chapters 190 and 170, F.S. This Master Methodology Report will be updated or supplemented to reflect the actual terms and conditions at the time of the issuance of the Bonds.

The District intends to impose non-ad valorem special assessments on the benefited lands within the Contracted Area of the District based on this Report. It is anticipated that all of the proposed special assessments will be collected through the Uniform Method of Collection described in chapter 197.3632, F.S. or any other legal means available to the District. It is not the intent of this Report to address any other assessments, if applicable, that may be levied by the District, a homeowner’s association, or any other unit of government.

Background

The District currently includes approximately 256.70 acres in the City of Melbourne, Florida. The District has filed a petition to contract the boundaries of the District, after contraction there will be approximately
154.14 acres within the new boundaries of the District (the “Contracted Area”). The development program for the Contracted Area within the

District currently envisions 536 single family units and 123 Townhome units (herein the “Development”). The proposed development plan is depicted in Table 1. It is recognized that such land use plan may change, and this Report will be modified accordingly.

The improvements contemplated by the District will provide facilities that benefit the assessable property within the Contracted Area within the District. The improvement program is delineated in the Engineer’s Report. The public improvements that may be acquired or constructed by the District include, but are not limited water and wastewater systems, stormwater management and control facilities, including, but not limited to, related earthwork; a reclaimed water system, roadway improvements; entry feature; a public park; and all related soft and incidental costs (the “Project or Improvement Plan”). The acquisition and construction costs are summarized in Table 2.

The assessment methodology is a three-step process. First, the District Engineer determines the costs of the Project contemplated by the District. Second, these costs form the basis for a bond sizing. Third, the bonded costs are divided among the benefited properties on the basis of benefit.

Special Benefits and Incidental Benefits

Although the general public outside the District may benefit from the District’s infrastructure improvements constituting the Project, such benefits will be incidental. The infrastructure program is designed to meet the needs to develop property within the Contracted Area within the District. Properties outside the boundaries of the Contracted Area of the District do not depend upon the District’s improvement program. The property owners within the Contracted Area within the District are therefore receiving special benefits not received by those outside the District’s boundaries.

Special Benefits Exceed the Costs Allocated

The direct and special benefits provided to the property owners within the Contracted Area within the District are greater than the costs associated with providing these benefits. The District Engineer estimates that the District’s Project that is necessary to support full development of property within the Contracted Area within the District will cost approximately
$26,472,696. The District’s Underwriter projects that the principal amount of Bonds required to fund a portion of the Project costs, the cost of issuance of the Bonds, the funding of debt service reserve and capitalized interest, will be approximately $28,000,000. Without the Project the

property would not be able to be developed and occupied by future residents of the community.

Requirements of a Valid Assessment Methodology

There are two requirements under Florida Law for a valid special assessment:

The properties must receive a special benefit from the improvements being paid for.
The assessments must be fairly and reasonably allocated to the properties being assessed.

2.0	Assessment Methodology

Overview

The District will issue approximately $28,000,000 in Bonds, to fund the District’s infrastructure improvements, provide for capitalized interest, fund one or more debt service reserve accounts, and pay the cost of issuance. It is the purpose of this methodology to allocate the $28,000,000 in debt to the properties benefiting from the Project.

Table 1 identifies the development plan (the “Development Plan”) as identified by Lennar Homes, LLC, (the “Developer”). The District adopted the Engineer’s Report for community wide capital improvements needed to support the Development and these construction costs are outlined in Table 2. The improvements needed to support the Development are described in detail in such Engineer’s Report and are estimated to cost $26,472,696. Based on the estimated costs, the size of the Bond issue under current market conditions needed to generate funds to pay for the Project and related costs was determined by the District’s Underwriter to total approximately $28,000,000. Table 3 shows the breakdown of the bond sizing.

Allocation of Benefit

The planned public improvements constituting the Project are an integrated system of facilities that benefit the assessable land within the Contracted Area within the District. That is, the first few feet of water line or sewer line benefit the landowners as much as the last few feet. The Improvement Plan works as a total system and provides direct and special

benefits for each land use. A fair and a reasonable method of allocating the benefit to each residential unit in the District would be by assigning an equivalent residential unit (“ERU”) to the product types based on relative size. The 536 single family homes, are the base unit and have been assigned one (1) ERU and a 123 townhome units are assigned .67 ERU Table 4 shows the allocation of benefits based on this ERU assignment. It is important to note that the direct and special benefit derived from the Project to the residential units is equal to or exceeds the cost that the units will be paying for such benefits. If different product types are contemplated, different ERU factors may be necessary, and this report will be amended accordingly.

Allocation of Debt

Allocation of debt is a continuous process until the Development Plan is completed. The initial assessments will be levied on an equal basis for all acres within the Contracted Area within the District. A fair and reasonable methodology allocates the debt incurred by the District proportionately to the properties receiving the direct and special benefits. At this point all the land within the Contracted Area within the District is benefiting equally from the Project and the special assessments will be assigned on a per acre basis.

Once platting, the recording of declaration of condominium, or other means of identifying individual lots (“Assigned Properties”) has begun, the assessments will be levied to the Assigned Properties based on the benefits they receive on a first platted, first assigned basis. The Unassigned Properties, defined as gross acres that have not been platted, will continue to be assessed on a per acre basis. Eventually the Development Plan will be completed and the debt relating to the Bonds will be allocated to the planned 536 single family lots and the 123 townhome lots within the Contracted Area of the District, which are the beneficiaries of the Improvement Plan, as depicted in Table 5. If there are changes to the Development Plan, a true up of the assessment will be calculated to determine if a payment from the Developer is required. Bonds assessments assessed on any land within the District must be satisfied prior to any transfer of such lands to a unit of Federal, State, or local government. This process is outlined in Section 3.0.

The assignment of debt in this Report sets forth the process by which debt represented by the Bonds is apportioned. As mentioned herein, this Report will be supplemented from time to time.

Special and Peculiar Benefit to the Property

The Project will provide peculiar, direct, and special benefit which flow from the logical relationship of the improvements to the properties. These peculiar, direct, special benefits consist of the added use of the property, added enjoyment of the property and the probability of increased marketability and value of the property. The direct, special, and peculiar benefits are more valuable than the cost of, or the actual non-ad valorem special assessment levied for the improvements.

Reasonable and Fair Apportionment of the Obligation to Pay

A reasonable estimate of the proportion of direct, special, and peculiar benefits received from the public improvements described in the Engineer’s Report is delineated in Table 4.

The determination has been made that the obligation to pay the non-ad valorem special assessments is fairly and reasonably apportioned because the direct, special, and peculiar benefits to the property derived from the acquisition and/or construction of the District’s improvements (and the concomitant responsibility for the payment of the resultant and allocated debt) have been apportioned to the property according to reasonable estimates of the direct, special, and peculiar benefits provided consistent with the one land use category.

Accordingly, no acre or parcel of property within the boundaries of the Contracted Area within the District will be liened for the payment of any non-ad valorem special assessment more than the determined direct, special, and peculiar benefit to that property and therefore, the debt allocation will not be increased more than the debt allocation set forth in this Report.

True Up

Although the District does not process plats, declaration of condominiums, site plans or revisions for the Developer, it does have an important role to play during the course of platting and site planning. Whenever a plat, declaration of condominium or site plan or revision is processed, or property is sold with development entitlements assigned by the Developer, the District must allocate a portion of its debt to the property according to the methodology outlined herein.

In addition, the District must also prevent any buildup of debt on Unassigned Properties. Otherwise, the land could be fully conveyed and/or platted without all of the debt being allocated. To preclude this, at the time Unassigned Properties become Assigned Properties, the District will determine the amount of anticipated assessment revenue that remains on the Unassigned Properties, taking into account the proposed plat or site plan approval. If the total anticipated assessment revenue to be generated from the Assigned and Unassigned Properties is greater than or equal to the maximum annual debt service on the Bonds, then no debt reduction payment will be required. In the case that the revenue generated is less than the required amount to pay debt service on the Bonds then a debt reduction payment by the Developer in the amount necessary to reduce the par amount of the outstanding Bonds plus accrued interest to a level that will be supported by the new maximum annual debt service will be required.

In addition, property that is sold with development entitlements assigned will be subject to a true- up test with respect to the entitlements conveyed to such property. In the event unplatted land is sold to a third party (the “Transferred Property”), the Bond Assessments will be assigned to such Transferred Property at the time of the sale based on the maximum total number of ERUs assigned by the Developer to that Transferred Property, subject to review by the District’s methodology consultant, to ensure that any such assignment is reasonable, supported by current development rights and plans, and otherwise consistent with this Report. The owner of the Transferred Property will be responsible for the total Bond Assessments applicable to the Transferred Property, regardless of the total number of ERUs ultimately actually platted. This total Bond Assessment is allocated to the Transferred Property at the time of the sale.

This true up mechanism may be memorialized through an agreement between the District and the Developer which may contain additional provisions.

Assessment Roll

The District will initially distribute the lien across the property within the Contracted Area of the District boundaries on a gross acreage basis. As Assigned Property becomes known with certainty, the District will refine its allocation of debt from a per acre basis to a per unit basis as shown in Table 5 on a first platted, first assigned basis. If the land use plan changes, then the District will update Table 5 to reflect the changes. As a result, the assessment liens are neither fixed nor are they determinable with certainty on any acre of land in the District prior to the time final Assigned Properties become known. As the development process occurs, the debt will be distributed against the Assigned Property in the manner described in this Report. The preliminary assessment roll is depicted in Table 6.

Additional Information

Governmental Management Services-South Florida, LLC (GMS) does not represent the District as a Municipal Advisor or Security Broker, nor is GMS registered to provide such services as described in the Sections 15B of the Security and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Similarly, GMS does not provide the District with advisory services or offer investment advice.

Certain information in this Report was provided by members of the District staff, the Developer or other professionals hired in conjunction with the bond issuance. GMS makes no representation regarding the information provided by others.

TABLE 1	
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM	

Land Use	No. of Units *	ERUs per Unit (1)	Total ERUs	

Single Family	536	1.00	536.00	
Townhomes	123	0.67	82.41	

Total Units	659	

618.41

(1) Benefit is allocated on an ERU basis; the Single Family Unit = to 1 ERU.

* Unit count is subject to change based on marketing and other factors.

TABLE 2	
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	
INFRASTRUCTURE COST ESTIMATES	

IMPROVEMENT	COST ESTIMATE

Water Distribution System	
$1,925,119.50	
Sanitary Sewer System Including Liftstation	$3,063,249.83	
Stormwater System	$11,526,596.69	
Reclaimed Water System	$1,337,562.00	
Spine Road Roadway Improvements	$1,075,629.00	
Entry Feature	$1,500,000.00	
Public Park	$750,000.00	
Sub Total Construction	$21,178,157.02	

Construction Contingency @ 15%	$3,176,723.55	
Engineering, Surveying, and Misc. Fees at 10% $ 1,600,600.67	$2,117,815.70	
$5,294,539.25

Total	$26,472,696

Information provided by Construction Engineering Group

TABLE 3	
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	
BOND SIZING	

 Sources:	

Par Amount *	$28,000,000

$28,000,000

 Uses:	

Construction Funds	
Debt Service Reserve	
Capitalized Interest	
Underwriter's Discount	
Cost of Issuance	

$23,648,365	
$1,980,055	
$1,610,000	
$560,000	
$201,580	

$28,000,000

Bond Assumptions:	
Interest Rate	5.75%	
Amortization(years)	30	
Capitalized Interest(months)	12	
Debt Service Reserve	100% of MADS	
Underwriters Discount	2.00%	

Maximuma Annual Debt Service (MADS)=	$1,980,055	

* Par amount is subject to change based on the actual terms at the sale of the bonds

TABLE 4	
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	
ALLOCATION OF BENEFIT	

Product Type	

No. of Units*	

ERU factor	

Total ERUs	
Percentage of Total ERU's	Total Improvements Costs	Total Improvements Costs per Unit	

Single Family	536	1.00	536.00	86.67%	$  22,944,916	$	42,808	
Townhomes	123	0.67	82.41	13.33%	$	3,527,781	$	28,681	

TOTALS	659	

618.41	100.00%	$  26,472,696	

* Unit count is subject to change based on marketing and other factors.

TABLE 5	
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	
ALLOCATION OF TOTAL PAR DEBT	
TO EACH PRODUCT TYPE	

Product Type	

No. of Units	

Total Cost Allocation	
Allocation of Par Debt	
Par Debt per Unit	

Single Family	536	$	22,944,916	$	24,268,689	$	45,277	
Townhomes	123	$	3,527,781	$	3,731,311	$	30,336	

TOTALS	659	$	26,472,696	$	28,000,000	

TABLE 6	
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	
PAR DEBT AND ANNUAL ASSESSMENT	
FOR EACH PRODUCT TYPE	

Product Type	

No. of Units	

Allocation of Par Debt	

Par Debt per Unit	
Maximum Annual Debt Service	Annual Debt Assessment per
Unit(1)	

Single Family	536	$	24,268,689	$	45,277	$	1,716,190	$	3,202	
Townhomes	123	$	3,731,311	$	30,336	$	263,864	$	2,145	

TOTALS	659	$	28,000,000	$	1,980,055	

(1) This amount will be grossed up 6% to cover collection fees and early payment discounts when collected on the Brevard County Tax Bill

TABLE 7	
MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL	

Parcel ID #	

Tract	

Assessable Acres	
Total Par Debt Allocation Per Parcel	Annual Debt Assessment Allocation Per
Parcel(1)	

See attached legal (after contraction)	A	154.14	$	28,000,000	$	1,980,055	
Totals		154.14	$	28,000,000	$	1,980,055	

	Bonds	
Annual Assessment Periods Projected Bond Rate (%)
Maximum Annual Debt Service	30	
	5.75%	
	$1,980,055	

(1) This amount will be grossed up 6% to cover collection fees and early payment discounts when collected on the Brevard County Tax Bill

NEW COD BOUNDARY

FLORIDA AVENUE

N88"53'57"W
saa·53'57"£

2742.55'
2628.231

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

POINT OF BEGINNING

PARCEL CDD-2

PARCEL CDD-1 NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT A,
MELBOURN£ CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91 BREVARD COUNTY. FLORIDA

saa·50'39"£

310.13 1

TRACT A
PARCEL CDD-1

52.621

R=390.00' D=43.1213911 L=294.13'

R=510.00' D=42.57'25" L=382.37'

s00·5a'27"W 40.001

NBB.46127 11W 115.001

NBB.4612711W 1045.361

PIRATE LANE

NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1-4

SKETCH	OF DESCRIPTION ONL Yl	THIS IS NOT A SURVEYl
AAL LANO SURVEYING SERVICES,  INC.
SHEET 1 OF 4
2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ASSUMED DATIJM AND ON lHE LINE SHOWN AS BEING lHE BASIS OF BEARINGS.

JOB # 48221 cpp REMAIN DATE: 12-11-25
SECTION 15, TOMISHIP 285, RANGE 37E
L.B. #6623

ANDREW W. POWSHOK
P.L.S. No. 5.38.3

.3970 MINTON ROAD
(321) 768-8110	�

 	

	

	

	

	

	

		

	

 	

	

	

	

	

 	

	

	

	

	

  

  

		    		 	 	 			

      		

  			

	

 			

RESOLUTION 2026-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AUTHORIZING	DISTRICT	PROJECTS	AND IMPROVEMENTS;		EQUALIZING,	APPROVING, CONFIRMING, AND LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PROPERTY SPECIALLY BENEFITED BY SUCH PROJECTS TO PAY THE COST THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT AND THE COLLECTION OF SUCH SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS BY THE METHOD PROVIDED FOR BY CHAPTERS 170 AND 197, FLORIDA STATUTES; CONFIRMING THE DISTRICT’S INTENTION TO ISSUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THAT:

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR THIS RESOLUTION. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to Chapters 170, 190 and 197, Florida Statutes.

SECTION 2. FINDINGS. The Board of Supervisors of the Mayfair Community Development District (the “Board”) hereby finds and determines as follows:
The Mayfair Community Development District (the “District”) is a local unit of special-purpose government organized and existing under and pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, as amended.
The District is authorized under Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, to fund, acquire, and construct roadway improvements; entry feature; stormwater management and control facilities, including but not limited to, related earthwork; water distribution and wastewater facilities ; landscaping, reclaimed water system, irrigation, and hardscaping in public areas; ; the acquisition of certain interests in land; and all related soft costs and related incidental costs related thereto to serve lands within the District (the “Improvements” or the “projects”).
The District is authorized by Chapter 170, Florida Statutes, to levy special assessments to pay all, or any part of the cost of such projects and, to issue special assessment bonds (the “Bonds”) payable from such special assessments as provided in Chapters 190 and 170, Florida Statutes.
It is necessary to the public safety and welfare that (i) the District provide the projects, the nature and location of which are described in Resolution 2026-08 and more specifically described in the Engineer’s Report for Mayfair Community Development District, prepared by Construction Engineering Group, LLC, dated March 5, 2026, amended on May 7, 2026, as may be further amended from time to time (the

“Engineer’s Report”) on file at the offices of the District Manager, 5385 N. Nob Hill Rd., Sunrise FL 33351 (collectively, the “District Office”), which Engineer’s Report is incorporated into and specifically made a part of this Resolution (ii) the cost of such projects be assessed against the lands specially benefited by such projects, and (iii) the District issue Bonds to provide funds for such purposes pending the receipt of such special assessments.
The provisions of said projects, the levying of such special assessments and the sale and issuance of such Bonds serves a proper, essential, and valid public purpose.
In order to provide funds with which to pay the costs of the projects which are to be assessed against the benefited properties pending the collection of such special assessments, it is necessary for the District to sell and issue its special assessment Bonds in one or more series; and
By Resolution 2026-08 adopted by the Board, the Board determined to provide the projects and the defray the cost thereof by making special assessments on benefited property and expressed an intention to issue the Bonds to provide the funds needed for the projects prior to the collection of such special assessments Resolution 2026-08 was adopted in compliance with the requirements of Section 170.03, Florida Statutes, and prior to the time the same was adopted, the requirements of Section 170.04, Florida Statutes; had been complied with; and
As directed by Resolution 2026-08 said resolution was published as required by Section 170.05, Florida Statutes, and a copy of the publisher’s affidavit of publication is on file with the Secretary of the Board; and
As directed by Resolution 2026-08, a preliminary assessment roll was prepared and filed with the Board as required by Section 170.06, Florida Statutes; and
As required by Section 170.07, Florida Statutes; upon completion of the preliminary assessment roll, the Board adopted Resolution 2026-09 fixing the time and place of a public hearing at which owners of the property to be assessed and other persons interested therein may appear before the Board and be heard as to (i) the propriety and advisability of making the public improvements comprising the projects,
(ii) the cost thereof, (iii) the manner of payment therefore, and (iv) the amount thereof to be assessed against each parcel specially benefited by such improvements and providing for the mailing publication of notice of such public hearing; and
Notice of such public hearing has been given by publication and by mail as required by Section 170.07, Florida Statutes, and affidavits as to such publication and mailing are on file in the office of the Secretary of the Board; and
At the time and place specified in the resolution and notice referred to in paragraph (k) above, the Board met as an Equalization Board, conducted such public hearing and heard and considered all complaints as to the matters described in paragraph (j) above, and based thereon, has made such modifications in the preliminary assessment roll as it deems desirable at this time; and
Having considered the costs of the projects, revised estimates of financing costs and all complaints and evidence presented at such public hearing, the Board finds and determines:

that the estimated costs of the projects are as specified in the Engineer’s Report and in the Master Assessment Methodology for Mayfair Community Development District, prepared by Governmental Management Services-South Florida, LLC, dated May 7, 2026, as amended from time to time, and which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit “A” (the “Assessment Report”);
it is reasonable, proper, just and right to assess the cost of such projects against the properties specially benefited thereby using the methods determined by the Board which will result in special assessments to be set forth on a final assessment roll to be adopted by the Board at the time when the final project costs, structure and interest rate on the Bonds to be issued by the District are known, it is hereby declared that the projects will constitute a special benefit to all parcels of real property to be listed on said final assessment roll and that the benefit, in the case of each such parcel, will be in excess of the special assessment thereon; and
it is desirable that the special assessments be paid and collected as herein provided

SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION OF DISTRICT PROJECTS. The projects described in Resolution 2026-08 and as more specifically described in the Engineer’s Report on file at the District Offices are hereby authorized and approved and the proper officers, employees and agents of the District are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action as may be necessary or desirable to cause the same to be made following the issuance of the Bonds referred to herein.

SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECTS. The total estimated costs of the projects and the costs to be paid by special assessments on all specially benefited property are set forth in the Engineer’s Report and the Assessment Report.

SECTION  5.    APPROVAL  AND  CONFIRMATION  OF  ASSESSMENT
METHODOLOGY. The Assessment Report sets forth in preliminary assessment roll previously adopted by this Board is hereby approved and confirmed. The special assessment against each respective parcel to be shown on such final assessment roll and interest and penalties thereon, as hereafter provide, shall be and shall remain a legal, valid and binding first lien on such parcel until paid; such lien shall be coequal with the lien of all state, county, district, municipal, or other governmental taxes and superior in dignity to all other liens, titles, and claims.

SECTION 6.  FINALIZATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.  When all of the
projects have both been constructed or otherwise provided to the satisfaction of the Board, the Board shall adopt a resolution accepting the same and determining the actual costs (including financing costs) thereof, as required by Section 170.08 and 170.09, Florida Statutes.  The District shall credit to each special assessment for projects the

difference between the special assessment as hereby made, approved and confirmed and the proportionate part of the actual costs of the projects, as finally determined upon completion thereof, but in no event shall the final amount of any such special assessment exceed the amount of benefits originally assessed hereunder. In making such credits no discount shall be granted or credit given for any part of the payee’s proportionate share of any actual bond financing costs, such as capitalized interest, funded reserves or bond discount included in the estimated cost of any such public improvements comprising the projects. Such credits shall be entered in the Improvement Lien Book. Once the final amount of special assessments for all of the public improvements constituting the project have been determined, the term “special assessment” shall, with respect to each parcel, mean the sum of the costs of the projects.

SECTION 7. PAYMENT AND PREPAYMENT OF NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND METHOD OF COLLECTION.
All non-ad valorem special assessments shall be payable in no more than thirty (30) annual installments which shall include interest, calculated in accordance with the Assessment Report. All special assessments collected utilizing the uniform method of collection shall be the amount determined in the first sentence of this paragraph divided by 1 minus the sum of the percentage cost of collection, necessary administrative costs and the maximum allowable discount for the early payment of taxes (currently four (4%) percent ).
The Board hereby elects, under its charter and Section 197.3631, Florida Statues, to use the method of collecting special assessments authorized by Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes. The Board has heretofore timely taken, or will timely take, all necessary actions to comply with the provisions of said Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes, and applicable rules adopted pursuant thereto; and, on or prior to the date on which the Bonds are issued, sold and delivered, the District shall enter into a written agreement with the Property Appraiser and Tax Collector of County in compliance therewith. Such non-ad valorem special assessments shall be subject to all the collection provisions of Chapter 197, Florida Statutes.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board reserves the right under Section 197.3631, Florida Statutes, to collect its non-ad valorem special assessments pursuant to Chapter 170, Florida Statutes, and to foreclose its non-ad valorem special assessment liens as provided for by law.
All special assessments may be prepaid, in whole or in part at any time, by payment of an amount equal to the principal amount of such prepayment plus interest accrued at the interest rate on the Bonds to which such special assessments are pledged to the first interest payment date which is more than forty-five (45) days prior to the date of such prepayment. All special assessments are also subject to prepayment in the amounts and at the times set forth in Chapter 170, Florida Statutes; provided, however, that the owner of land subject to the Special Assessments may elect to waive such statutory right of prepayment.

SECTION 8. SEVERABILITY. If any section or part of a section of this resolution be declared invalid or unconstitutional, the validity, force and effect of any other section or part of a section of this resolution shall not thereby be affected or impaired unless it clearly appears that such other section or part of a section of this resolution is wholly or necessarily dependent upon the section or part of a section so held to be invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 9. CONFLICTS. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, superseded and repealed.

SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF June 2026

MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Secretary / Assistant Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman

Exhibit “A” – Assessment Report

CFN 2026115146, OR BK 10644  Page 1026, Recorded 06/05/2026 at 09:34 AM Rachel
M. Sadoff, Clerk of Courts, Brevard County

This instrument prepared by or under the supervision ol'(and
alicr recording should be returned lo):	(Space reserved for Clerk of Court)

Name: Address:

Michael J. Pawelczyk, Esq.
Billing Cochran, P.A.
515 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 3330 I

	

FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OF THE MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
This First Amended Notice of Establishment is recorded pursuant to the requirements of Section 190.0485, Florida Statutes and amends the Notice of Establislunent of the Mayfair Community Development District recorded at Official Records Book 5771, Page 9940 in the Public Records of Brevard County, Florida.
The Mayfair Community Development District was established by virtue of Ordinance No. 2007-20 of the City of Melbourne, in Brevard County Florida (the "City"), and adopted on April 10, 2007. Pursuant to Section 190.046, Florida Statutes, the boundaries of the District were contracted by virtue of Ordinance No. 2026-22 of the City, adopted on May 26, 2026, removing those lands described in Exhibit "A" from the District. Effective May 26, 2026, the amended legal description of the Mayfair Community Development District is that which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit "B''.

THE MAYFAIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAY IMPOSE AND LEVY TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, OR BOTH TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, ON THIS PROPERTY. THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS PAY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES OF THE DISTRICT AND ARE SET ANNUALLY BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE DISTRICT. THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO COUNTY AND OTHER Jh)CAL GOVERNMENTAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS AN  ALL	R TA�'ES AND ASSESSMENTS PROVIDED FOR BYLAW.		/

By:	,,.	,,	-	_
sel Mayfair Corn	u rty Development District

/

OR BK  10644  PG  1027

STATE OF FLORIDA	}
COUNTY OF BREVARD	}

JENNIFER PAOLI
MY COMMISSION # HH 661160 EXPIRES: July 18, 2029

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of [x] physical presence or [_J online notarization, this�day of June, 2026, by Michael J. Pawelczyk, as District Counsel of the Mayfair Community Development District. He is personally known to me.

(SEAL)
Printed Name of Notary Notary Public, State of Florida

OR BK  10644  PG  1028

Exhibit "A"

OR BK  10644  PG  1029

DESCRIPTION: REMOVING FROM CDD BOUNDARY

A PORTION OF TRACT B, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91, LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6159, PAGE 1011, OFFICIAL RECORDS B001< 7638, PAGE 2397, A PORTION OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOI< 7764, PAGE 2279 AND A PORTION OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7764, PAGE 2283, INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°58'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1865.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 00°58'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°01'41" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42°57'25", THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 299.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 48°00'5411 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 622.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°20'27", THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 55.34 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 88"46'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3708.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°39'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2061.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
88°53'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 591.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°40'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 515.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°53'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1356.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°42'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 902.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°50'39'' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 310.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°43'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 848.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88"45'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
418.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°06'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 312.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°29118" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 48.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°13'24", THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 56.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 56°17'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33"42'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°54'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 135.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°52'27'', THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 39.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 01°13'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 427.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°46'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1045.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 390.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43"12'39"; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 294.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 48"00'54" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 622.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42°57'25", THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 382.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 89°01'4111 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 52.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00"58'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°01'41" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

OR BK  10644  PG  1030

LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:

A PORTION OF TRACT B, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT B001( 73, PAGES 85-91, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A; THENCE RUN NORTH 88°53'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2742.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°06'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 00°42'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1880.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°16'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 506.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°46'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 283.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°42'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 266.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°13'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 263.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°46'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°13'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 737.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°46'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 44.97 FEET; TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°28'51", THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 42.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 00°42'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°17'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 94.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°42'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 961.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°53'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 550.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 102.57 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

OR BK	10644  PG  1031

Exhibit "B"

OR BK 10644  PG  1032

NEW CDD BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION: PARCEL CDD-1
ALL OF TRACT A AND A PORTION OF TRACT B, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°58'27" WEST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIPSCOMB STREET, A DISTANCE OF 1,865.03 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PIRATE LANE FOR THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) CALLS: NORTH 89°01'41" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°58'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°01'41" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 52.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 510.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42°57'25", THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 382.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 48°00'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 622.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 390.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°12'39", THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 294.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 88°46'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1045.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°13'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 427.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°52'27", THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 39.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 88°54'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 135.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33°42'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56°17'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°13'24", THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 56.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 58°2911811 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 48.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°06'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
312.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°45'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 418.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°43'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 848.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°50'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 310.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°42'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 902.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°53'5711 EAST ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FLORIDA AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 2628.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 128.62 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

OR BK	10644  PG  1033

DESCRIPTION: PARCEL CDD-2

A PORTION OF TRACT B, MELBOURNE CITY CENTER AT MAYFAIR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 73, PAGES 85-91, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT A; THENCE RUN NORTH 88°53157" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2742.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°06'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 00°42'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1880.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°16'22" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 506.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°46'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 283.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°42'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 266.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°13'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 263.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°46'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°13'42" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 737.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°46'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 44.97 FEET; TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°28'51", THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 42.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 00°42133" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89"17'27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
94.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°42'33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 961.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°53'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 550.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 25.52 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

MEMORANDUM
TO:	District Manager

FROM:	Billing Cochran, P.A. District Counsel

DATE:	June 11, 2026

RE:	2026 Legislative Update

As District Counsel, throughout the year we continuously monitor pending legislation that may be applicable to the governance and operation of our Community Development District and other Special District clients. It is at this time of year that we summarize those legislative acts that have become law during the most recent legislative session, as follows:

Chapter [TBD], Laws of Florida (HB 0145). This legislation amends the sovereign‑immunity statute to raise liability caps and change tort‑claim procedures for government entities. The bill revises Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, increasing the statutory limits on damages recoverable against the state and its agencies/subdivisions (including special districts). For causes of action accruing on or after October 1, 2026, the liability caps increase from $200,000 to $350,000 per person and from $300,000 to $500,000 per incident. The bill also authorizes state agencies and subdivisions to settle claims or judgments in excess of those caps, up to available insurance limits, without requiring a legislative claims bill.

The bill authorizes a state subdivision (e.g. counties, municipalities, special districts including CDDs) to settle a claim or judgment in excess of the statutory cap without requiring a separate legislative claim bill, so long as settlement is within insurance coverage limits. The bill prohibits any insurance policy issued on or after October 1, 2026, from conditioning liability coverage or payment on the later enactment of a legislative claim bill.

In addition, the bill shortens the pre-suit notice period by requiring claimants to present a claim to the appropriate agency within 18 months after accrual of the claim, rather than the current three-year period. It also revises the statute of limitations by requiring most negligence actions against governmental entities to be filed within two (2) years, while maintaining existing limitations periods for medical malpractice, wrongful death, and contribution claims. The bill also reduces the time for an agency or the Department of Financial Services to make a final disposition of a claim before it is deemed denied, from six (6) months to four (4) months.

This law applies directly to CDDs because CDDs are among the “subdivisions” of state government covered by section 768.28, Florida Statutes. As such CDDs may now be subject to higher damage awards for tort claims.

Chapter [TBD], Laws of Florida (HB 273). This legislation revises Florida law governing state financial assistance and rural economic development programs to include certain

special districts and improve payment processing for eligible rural entities. The bill amends Section 215.971, Florida Statutes to allow state agencies, under certain conditions, to directly facilitate or expedite payment of invoices for counties, municipalities, and qualifying special districts, particularly those located in rural areas or designated rural areas of opportunity. It authorizes agencies to structure agreements so that eligible rural governments and certain special districts, especially those providing water and wastewater services, receive faster payment processing for verified, completed work. The intent is to reduce financial strain and cash flow challenges that rural entities often face when administering state-funded projects, while preserving existing legal and regulatory requirements. The legislation also amends Section 288.0656, Florida Statutes to expand the definition of “rural community” to explicitly include independent special districts that provide water and wastewater services within rural areas of opportunity. This expansion makes those districts eligible for rural economic development support programs and related state assistance. The act takes effect July 1, 2026.

This legislation applies CDDs in a limited and conditional way, depending on the type of CDD and the services it provides. CDDs that are involved in state-funded infrastructure projects, such as water, wastewater, drainage, or utility improvements, may benefit from the amendment to Section 215.971, Florida Statutes. If a CDD is acting as a recipient or sub recipient of state financial assistance, the law allows state agencies to structure agreements so that invoices can be processed and paid more quickly for verified work. This can improve cash flow for CDDs building infrastructure, particularly smaller or rural CDDs that rely on this type of reimbursement funding. Second, the bill’s expansion of the definition of “rural community” under Section 288.0656, Florida Statutes generally does not directly include most CDDs, because eligibility is tied primarily to counties, municipalities, and independent special districts providing water and wastewater services in rural areas of opportunity. A typical CDD would only benefit if it meets those narrow conditions, meaning it operates in a qualifying rural area and functions in a way that aligns with the statutory definition (or is structured similarly to an independent utility-focused district).

Chapter [TBD], Laws of Florida (HB 0655). This legislation creates a new exemption under Florida law (Section 70.90, Florida Statutes) that allows agencies to hold closed attorney-client meetings during the 90-day notice period for claims brought under the Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act. These closed meetings are limited to discussions between the agency and its attorney for purposes of settlement strategy or negotiation of private property rights claims. While the meetings are exempt from Florida’s Sunshine Law, they must still be recorded by a certified court reporter, fully transcribed, and later released as a public record once the claim is resolved or the statute of limitations expires if no settlement or litigation occurs.

The law also creates a temporary public records exemption for the transcripts, recordings, minutes, and related materials generated during these closed sessions, ensuring confidentiality during active negotiations. However, this exemption is not permanent; it is subject to future legislative review and sunsets in 2031 unless reenacted. The act takes effect July 1, 2026.

The law allows a CDD Board of Supervisors to hold closed attorney-client sessions when the CDD is facing a pre-suit claim under the Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act regarding topics such as land use impacts, infrastructure construction, easement disputes, and development-related claims that can trigger property rights assertions under the Bert Harris Act.

During these closed sessions, the CDD can privately discuss settlement strategy with its attorney without public disclosure of sensitive legal positions. However, the exemption is narrow and procedural. The CDD must still provide public notice of the meeting, the session must begin and end in an open meeting, and a certified court reporter must record everything discussed. Although the discussion is confidential at the time, the transcript becomes a public record once the claim is resolved or the statutory timeframe expires if no settlement or lawsuit is filed.

Chapter 2026-115, Laws of Florida (HB 1085). This legislation creates the Local Government Cybersecurity Protection Program within the Florida Digital Service to assist local governments in strengthening cybersecurity defenses, particularly against threats such as ransomware. It establishes a statewide grant and procurement program that allows eligible local governments to access cybersecurity-related information technology commodities and services through contracts managed by the Florida Digital Service, with a preference for fiscally constrained counties. The program also requires data-sharing agreements between the state and participating local governments to support threat detection, prevention, and incident response.

Local governments may either apply for grants or independently purchase cybersecurity services through state-negotiated contracts, though the local government remains responsible for any associated costs. The law further requires annual reporting to the Governor and Legislature on program participation, funding, and outcomes, ensuring oversight and transparency. The program is set to operate through 2031 unless reenacted. The act takes effect July 1, 2026.

This law applies to CDDs because CDDs are local governments for many operational purposes, including infrastructure, procurement, and administrative functions, and therefore fall within the category of eligible participants under the Local Government Cybersecurity Protection Program. CDDs would be able to access state-negotiated cybersecurity contracts and services through the Florida Digital Service to improve protection of district systems. Even if a CDD does not apply for a cybersecurity grant, it may still purchase cybersecurity commodities and services through the state contracts, which could help reduce costs and improve security standards. However, participation is optional rather than mandatory, and CDDs remain responsible for all costs associated with any purchases or services obtained under the program.

Chapter [TBD], Laws of Florida (SB 1180). This legislation makes several targeted but significant changes to the law governing CDDs under Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, with the most important impact being the creation of a formal recall process for elected board members. The bill’s primary feature is the creation of a new statutory section establishing a detailed procedure that allows qualified electors within a CDD to remove elected members of the board of supervisors through a recall process. The law limits recall to specific grounds such as malfeasance, misfeasance, neglect of duty, incompetence, drunkenness, permanent inability to perform duties, or conviction of certain felonies. It sets out a structured, multi-step process that begins with a petition signed by at least 10 percent of eligible voters, followed by verification of signatures, the preparation of a formal record of recall proceedings, and then a second petition requiring 15 percent of electors to trigger a recall referendum. If the referendum proceeds, a majority vote determines whether the board member is removed from office, and any resulting vacancy is filled according to existing statutory procedures. The legislation also imposes campaign finance requirements on recall efforts, establishes timelines, governs petition form and verification, allows limited

withdrawal of signatures, and creates penalties for fraud or misconduct in the petition process. In addition to the recall framework, the bill clarifies that CDD board members elected by residents are subject to recall, aligning CDD governance more closely with other forms of local government accountability. It also provides that individuals removed by recall, or who resign after a recall petition is filed, are ineligible for reappointment to the board for two years.

The legislation further revises the definition of “compact, urban, mixed-use district” under Section 190.003, Florida Statutes. The revised definition applies to districts consisting of a maximum of 75 acres located within a municipality and within either a qualified opportunity zone or a community redevelopment area. The amendment clarifies qualifying development thresholds by providing that such districts must include either at least 400,000 square feet of retail development and 500 residential units, or at least 250,000 square feet of commercial development and 500 affordable residential rental units for very-low-income, low-income, or moderate-income persons. This revision is significant for developers because it affects eligibility and structuring considerations for the creation of certain community development districts.

The legislation clarifies that restrictions on local regulation of synthetic turf do not prevent a CDD from enforcing private deed restrictions, preserving a CDD’s ability to uphold community standards through covenants. The act takes effect July 1, 2026.

This law applies directly to CDDs because it creates, for the first time, a formal statutory process that allows residents to recall elected members of a CDD board of supervisors. It introduces clear procedures, thresholds, and legal standards for removal, thereby increasing accountability of board members to district electors. The law also clarifies that CDDs may continue enforcing deed restrictions despite broader limits on local regulation of synthetic turf and updates certain statutory definitions affecting district formation and development. Overall, the most significant impact is the shift toward greater resident oversight and governance accountability within CDDs.

Chapter 2026-3, Laws of Florida (SB 290). This legislation revises multiple areas of state law, with a primary focus on agriculture, public safety, contractor regulation, and consumer protection. A significant component of the legislation strengthens contractor and vendor accountability by requiring contractors to pay subcontractors and suppliers within 45 days of receiving payment, or in accordance with contractual terms, and authorizing disciplinary action for noncompliance. Additionally, vendors that default on contracts, fail to pay subcontractors, or demonstrate repeated poor performance may be suspended or barred from public contracting for up to five years.

The bill further clarifies and reinforces how public entities may lawfully spend funds and administer contracts for public purposes. The legislation affirms that public funds may be used for core governmental infrastructure and improvements, such as public buildings, emergency shelters, affordable housing, and energy efficiency projects, thereby helping to define the scope of permissible capital projects and expenditures. At the same time, it places limitations on the use of public funds for certain privately owned facilities, reinforcing the principle that expenditures must primarily serve a valid public purpose rather than confer a disproportionate private benefit. The act takes effect July 1, 2026.

This law applies directly to CDDs because CDDs function as local units of special-purpose government that procure services, manage infrastructure, and enter into public contracts. Since a CDD regularly contracts for construction, maintenance, and infrastructure improvements, the new requirement that contractors timely pay subcontractors and suppliers directly affects how a CDD administers its contracts. In addition, the provisions allowing suspension or disqualification of nonperforming vendors from public contracting are relevant to CDD procurement practices, especially where the district adopts or mirrors state purchasing standards. CDDs routinely finance and construct infrastructure such as roadways, utilities, stormwater systems, and public facilities. Clarifications regarding allowable public expenditures, such as for government buildings, emergency shelters, and infrastructure, help define the scope of permissible CDD projects and may influence how CDDs’ structure future capital plans and bond-funded improvements.

Portions of the bill related to consumer protection and fraud prevention, including prohibitions on misrepresentation (such as impersonating officials), have indirect relevance. CDDs and District Management interact with residents, property owners, and contractors, so these provisions reinforce broader legal standards around transparency, proper representation, and avoidance of deceptive practices in district operations.

Chapter 2026-7, Laws of Florida (HB 399). This legislation is a comprehensive land use and development reform measure that primarily limits local government discretion in permitting, zoning, and development regulation while promoting consistency, affordability, and predictability in the development process. A central component of the legislation requires that application fees for development permits and orders imposed by counties and municipalities must be directly tied to the actual costs of reviewing and processing applications, must be publicly listed, and may not be based on construction value or project cost, thereby preventing fee structures that scale with development size rather than administrative expense. The act takes effect upon becoming law.
Even though CDDs do not exercise zoning or land use regulatory authority, the law applies to CDDs as infrastructure and service providers within the framework established by counties and municipalities. As a result, the bill’s restrictions on local governments, particularly those related to development permitting, zoning, and land development regulations, will shape the regulatory environment in which CDDs plan, finance, and construct infrastructure.

The provisions limiting development application fees to actual administrative costs may reduce overall project costs for developments within CDD boundaries, which can influence the scope and timing of infrastructure financed by the CDD, including roads, utilities, and stormwater systems. Similarly, the requirement for more objective and clearly defined compatibility standards, along with limits on discretionary denials, may create a more predictable entitlement process, allowing CDDs to better coordinate infrastructure planning with approved development timelines and reduce delays that can affect bond issuances or capital improvement programs.

Although Chapter 2026-7 does not directly regulate CDD powers or governance, it significantly affects the local government land use framework that CDDs rely on, thereby affecting development timing, infrastructure planning, financing, and overall project feasibility within district boundaries.

Chapter [TBD], Laws of Florida (HB 967). This legislation establishes a clear legislative intent that local governments must accept electronic forms of payment, including credit cards, debit cards, charge cards, and electronic funds transfers, and specifically requires units of local government to offer online payment options. This applies broadly to counties, municipalities, special districts, and other local government entities, as well as constitutional officers such as clerks of court and tax collectors, unless another form of payment is required by law.

The legislation also preserves existing authority allowing local governments to pass along processing fees to users who choose electronic payment methods and confirms that governments are not liable for verifying card validity or available funds when processing such transactions. Importantly, it mandates that if a local government accepts electronic payments, it must also maintain an online system for doing so, reinforcing a statewide push toward digital accessibility and standardized payment options.

This legislation requires CDDs that collect any type of payment, such as fees, user charges, amenity payments, permit-related charges, or other CDD revenues, to offer electronic payment options, including credit cards, debit cards, and electronic funds transfers. It also specifically requires that if a CDD accepts electronic payments at all, it must maintain a system for accepting those payments online, which may require updates to CDD websites, billing platforms, or third-party payment processors. The legislation also allows CDDs to continue passing through processing fees associated with electronic payments (such as credit card convenience fees), and it preserves their ability to require verification of payment validity and sufficient funds. However, it removes discretion in practice by making online payment capability a mandatory feature for any CDD that accepts electronic payments in any form.

For convenience, we have included copies of the legislation referenced in this memorandum. We request that you include this memorandum as part of the agenda packages for upcoming meetings of the governing boards of those special districts in which you serve as the District Manager and this firm serves as District Counsel. For purposes of the agenda package, it is not necessary to include the attached legislation, as we can provide copies to anyone requesting the same. Copies of the referenced legislation are also accessible by visiting this link: http://laws.flrules.org/.

Mayfair	
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT	

Check Register	
Fiscal Year 2026	
05/01/26 - 05/31/26	

Date	Check #'s	Amount	

05/01/26 - 05/31/26	309-310	$	3,503.89	

TOTAL	$	3,503.89	

AP300R	YEAR-TO-DATE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PREPAID/COMPUTER CHECK REGISTER	RUN	6/16/26	PAGE	1
*** CHECK DATES 05/01/2026 - 05/31/2026 ***	MAYFAIR CDD (SOUTH FLORIDA)

CHECK	VEND# DATE	.....INVOICE..... ...EXPENSED TO...		VENDOR NAME DATE	INVOICE	YRMO	DPT ACCT# SUB	SUBCLASS	STATUS		AMOUNT	....CHECK..... AMOUNT	#	
5/19/26 00005	4/30/26 198517	202604 310-51300-31500
BILLING COCHRAN, P.A.	*		750.00	
750.00 000309	
- - - - - - - - 5/19/26 00006	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5/01/26 233	202605 310-51300-34000
5/01/26 233	202605 310-51300-35110	- - - - - - -
*
*	- - - - -	- - - - -

100.00	- - - - - - - -	
	MAY 26 - WEBSITE ADMIN
5/01/26 233	202605 310-51300-42000	*		.74		
	MAY 26 - POSTAGE
5/01/26 233	202605 310-51300-42500	*		3.15		
	MAY 26 - COPIES
GMS-SF, LLC				2,753.89 000310	
- - - - - - - -	- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -	- - - - - - -	- - - - -	- - - - -	- - - - - - - -	
	TOTAL FOR	BANK A		3,503.89		
	TOTAL FOR	REGISTER		3,503.89		

BANK A MAYFAIR CDD

APR 26 - ATTORNEY FEES

MAY 26 - MGMT FEES

2,650.00

MFSF MAYFAIR S FLA	ACOOPER

Mayfair	
Community Development District	

Unaudited Financial Reporting	
May 31, 2026	

Table of Contents

	Balance Sheet

	General Fund

	Month to Month

	Assessment Receipt Schedule

Mayfair	
Community Development District	
Combined Balance Sheet	
May 31, 2026	

General Fund

Assets:	
Cash:	
Operating Account	

$	371
Investments:
State Board Administration	44,488

Total Assets	$	44,859	
Liabilities:	
Accounts Payable	$	1,775	

Total Liabilites	$	1,775

Fund Balance:	
Assigned for:	
Parcel Boundaries	
Unassigned	

$	8,500	
34,584	

Total Liabilities & Fund Balance	$	44,859

Total Fund Balances	$	43,084

Mayfair	
Community Development District	
General Fund	
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance	
For The Period Ending May 31, 2026	

Adopted	Prorated Budget	Actual	
Budget	Thru 05/31/26	Thru 05/31/26	Variance	

Revenues:		
Special Assessments - Tax Roll	$	70,039	
Interest Income	-	

$	70,039	
-	

$	70,195	
1,082	

$	156	
1,082	

Total Revenues	$	70,039	$	70,039	$	71,278	$	1,238	

Expenditures:			
General & Administrative:			
Engineering	$	5,000	$	3,333	$	8,440	$	(5,107)	
Attorney Fees	15,000	10,000	17,700	(7,700)	
Annual Audit	3,500	3,300	3,300	-	
Management Fees	31,800	21,200	21,200	-	
Annual Assessment	5,000	5,000	5,000	-	
Website Maintenance	1,200	800	800	-	
Telephone	50	33	-	33	
Postage & Delivery	500	333	59	274	
Insurance General Liability	7,650	6,730	6,730	-	
Printing & Binding	500	333	11	323	
Legal Advertising	1,500	1,000	1,498	(498)	
Other Current Charges	550	367	548	(181)	
Office Supplies	150	100	-	100	
Contingencies	1,687	1,125	1,500	(375)	
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	175	175	175	-	
Total Expenditures	$	74,262	$	53,830	$	66,960	$	(13,130)	

Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures	$	(4,223)	$	16,209	$	4,317	$	(11,892)	

Net Change in Fund Balance	$	(4,223)	$	16,209	$	4,317	$	(11,892)	
	
Fund Balance - Beginning	$	4,223		$	38,766		
	
Fund Balance - Ending	$	-		$	43,084		

Mayfair	
Community Development District	
Month to Month	

Oct	Nov	Dec	Jan	Feb	March	April	May	June	July	Aug	Sept	Total	

Revenues:														
Special Assessments - Tax Roll	$	-	$	-	$  70,099	$	96	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$  70,195	
Interest Income	96	73	63	109	202	210	182	147	-	-	-	-	1,082	

Total Revenue	$	96	$	73	$  70,162	$	206	$	202	$	210	$	182	$	147	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$  71,278	

Expenditures:														
General & Administrative:														
Engineering	$	1,700	$	-	$	-	$	6,740	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	8,440	
Attorney Fees	875	1,000	900	3,975	7,825	600	750	1,775	-	-	-	-	17,700	
Annual Audit	-	-	3,300	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,300	
Management Fees	2,650	2,650	2,650	2,650	2,650	2,650	2,650	2,650	-	-	-	-	21,200	
Annual Assessment	5,000		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5,000	
Website Maintenance	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	-	-	-	-	800	
Telephone	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	
Postage & Delivery	1	47	1	3	2	2	1	1	-	-	-	-	59	
Insurance General Liability	6,730	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6,730	
Printing & Binding	-	-	6	-	-	1	-	3	-	-	-	-	11	
Legal Advertising	333	-	-	-	1,165	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,498	
Other Current Charges	90	77	77	45	45	60	77	77	-	-	-	-	548	
Office Supplies	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	
Contingencies	1,500	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,500	
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	175	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	175	
Total Expenditures	$  19,154	$	3,874	$	7,035	$  13,513	11,786.95	$	3,413	$	3,578	$	4,606	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$  66,960	

Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures	$  (19,058)	$	(3,801)	$  63,127	$  (13,307)	$  (11,585)	$	(3,203)	$	(3,397)	$	(4,459)	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	4,317	

Net Change in Fund Balance	$ (19,058)	$  (3,801)	$  63,127	$ (13,307)	$ (11,585)	$  (3,203)	$  (3,397)	$  (4,459)	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	4,317	

Mayfair
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
Special Assessment Receipts - Miami-Dade County Fiscal Year 2026

Gross Assessments	$	74,510.00 $	74,510.00	
Net Assessments	$	70,784.50	$	70,784.50	
ON ROLL ASSESSMENTS
allocation in %	100.00%	100.00%

Date	
Distribution	
Gross Amount	Discoumt/
Penalty	
Commission	
Interest	
Net Receipts	
O&M Portion	
Total	

12/14/25	
12/01/25 - 12/15/25	
$	74,510.00	
$	2,980.40	
$	1,430.59	
$	-	
$	70,099.01	
$	70,099.01	
$	70,099.01	
01/30/26	Interest	-	-	-	96.19	96.19	96.19	96.19	
	TOTAL	$	74,510.00	$	2,980.40	$	1,430.59	$	96.19	$	70,195.20	$	70,195.20	$	70,195.20	

100.00% Percent Collected
$	-	maining to Collect